<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com">
<title>Theory, Culture &amp; Society recent issues</title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Theory, Culture &amp; Society RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Theory, Culture &amp; Society</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0263-2764</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/12?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/25?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/45?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/55?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/78?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/109?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/134?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/186?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/206?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/234?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/6/263?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/6/267?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/30?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/44?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/61?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/108?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/129?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/141?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/5/151?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/5/156?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/25?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/47?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/67?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/97?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/147?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/155?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/2-3/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/23?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/47?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/73?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/89?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/113?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/139?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/189?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/233?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/249?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/275?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/294?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/316?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/330?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/346?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Theory, Culture &amp; Society</title>
<url>http://tcs.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introduction: Thinking after Michel Foucault]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This Introduction to the Special Issue of <I>Theory, Culture &amp; Society</I> on Michel Foucault draws out from the papers included the possibilities for new critiques of the present and new directions for the future, both for research in the social sciences and for imagining alternative ways of being. It highlights the innovative aspects of all the papers, and thus demonstrates that, in spite of the shortcomings in Foucault&rsquo;s work which are picked out in the papers, his explorations of power, subjectivity and what it means to be and to think continue to be relevant as a starting point for a range of reflections about our own times.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venn, C., Terranova, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409353776</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introduction: Thinking after Michel Foucault]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>11</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/12?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alternatives to the Prison: Dissemination or Decline of Social Control?]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/12?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper examines the problem of alternatives to the prison in order to problematize the prison as an institution, as a form of punishment and as a system for promoting respect for the law. It argues that the mechanisms that were central to the prison during the 19th century, such as the practice of penitence as a principle of rehabilitation, the family as agent of correction, or as agent of legality, and labour as a fundamental instrument for punishment, still operate today, if in altered forms, in both the conventional and alternatives types of prison. The prison has been a factory for producing criminals; this production is not a mark of its failure but of its success. Prison manages control over illegalities by means of a whole set of apparatuses that manage their reorganization, redistributing them according to an economy of illegalisms. It may well be that changes in the economy and in the mechanisms for regulating populations mean that the carceral functions of the prison are today being disseminated at the level of the social body, so that they would now operate beyond the space of the prison through multiple instances of control, surveillance, normalization and re-socialization. The question of the prison cannot be resolved or even posed in terms of a simple penal theory. Neither can it be posed in tems of a psychology or sociology of crime. The question of the role and possible disappearance of the prison can only be posed in terms of an economy and a politics, that is, a political economy of illegalisms.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foucault, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409353775</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alternatives to the Prison: Dissemination or Decline of Social Control?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>24</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/25?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Foucault's Untimely Struggle: Toward a Form of Spirituality]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/25?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In his series of essays on Kant written during the 1980s, Michel Foucault attempted to discern the difference today made with respect to yesterday. As his essays as well as his lectures (especially at the Coll&egrave;ge de France and Berkeley) during the early 1980s demonstrate, he was drawn &mdash; and devoted the bulk of his scholarly efforts to a renewed form of genealogical work on themes, venues, practices and modes of governing the subject and others &mdash; to experiments in new forms of friendship, sociability and transformations of the self and others that he saw taking shape, or imagined were taking shape around him. This work, which has come to be known unfortunately as the &lsquo;late Foucault&rsquo;, arose out of deep dissatisfaction with his own life conditions, the broader political climate of the time, and a profound and unexpected rethinking not only of the specific projects he had intended to carry out but of what it meant to think. This article explores some of the elements at play during these deeply (re)formative several years, which as they unfolded were in no way intended to constitute a &lsquo;late Foucault&rsquo;, quite the opposite, even if fate would have it otherwise. The article begins with a &lsquo;prelude&rsquo; that introduces the problem of what <I>mode</I> is appropriate for giving form to thinking. It proceeds to argue that Foucault engaged in a struggle to redefine the <I>object</I> of thinking; that in order to do so he was led to pursue a <I>venue</I> in which such thinking could be practised; and finally to an increasingly articulate and acute quest for a <I>form</I> that would constitute a difference between what Foucault diagnosed as an impoverished modern problem space and a future in which things might be different and better.If we define spirituality as being the form of practices which postulate that, such as he is, the subject is not capable of the truth, but that, such as it is, the truth can transfigure and save the subject, then we can say that the modern age of the relations between the subject and truth begin when it is postulated that, such as he is, the subject is capable of truth, but that, such as it is, the truth cannot save the subject. (Foucault, 2005: 19)</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rabinow, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409347699</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Foucault's Untimely Struggle: Toward a Form of Spirituality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>44</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/45?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identity, Nature, Life: Three Biopolitical Deconstructions]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/45?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article examines three terms associated with the take-up of Foucault&rsquo;s analysis of the biopolitical, namely identity, nature and life. It argues that Foucault opposes their reduction respectively to sameness, to origin, or to some primordial force. These reductions not only fall into species of metaphysics, they fail to recognize the integration of difference and of constitutive relationality in Foucault&rsquo;s conceptualization of the process of subjectivation and becoming as historically dynamic and mobile. The article emphasizes the importance of historicization and of a constructive genealogy in Foucault&rsquo;s approach, running counter to metaphysics, and opening new avenues for political action based on the recognition of the interiority of resistance to <I>dispositifs</I> of power and of the creative force in individuation.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Revel, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409348854</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identity, Nature, Life: Three Biopolitical Deconstructions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>54</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/55?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self as Enterprise: Dilemmas of Control and Resistance in Foucault's The Birth of Biopolitics]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/55?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article considers Foucault&rsquo;s analysis of ordoliberal and neoliberal governmental reason and its reorganization of social relations around a notion of enterprise. I focus on the particular idea that the generalization of the enterprise form to social relations was conceptualized in such exhaustive terms that it encompassed subjectivity itself. Self as enterprise highlights, <I>inter alia</I>, dynamics of control in neoliberal regimes which operate through the organized proliferation of individual difference in an economized matrix. It also throws into question conceptions of individual autonomy that underpin much political thought and upon which ideas about political resistance are based. Self as enterprise also problematizes the viability of Foucault&rsquo;s later work on ethics of the self as a practice of resistance. I go on to argue that Foucault&rsquo;s discussion of an unresolved clash in civil society between monarchical and governmental power, between law and norm, offers an elliptical but more promising account of opposition to normalizing bio-power.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McNay, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409347697</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self as Enterprise: Dilemmas of Control and Resistance in Foucault's The Birth of Biopolitics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>77</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>55</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/78?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Topologies of Power: Foucault's Analysis of Political Government beyond 'Governmentality']]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/78?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The publication of Michel Foucault&rsquo;s lectures at the Coll&egrave;ge de France in the late 1970s has provided new insight into crucial developments in his late work, including the return to an analysis of the state and the introduction of biopolitics as a central theme. According to one dominant interpretation, these shifts did not entail a fundamental methodological break; the approach Foucault developed in his work on knowledge/power was simply applied to new objects. The present article argues that this reading &mdash; which is colored by the overwhelming privilege afforded to <I>Discipline and Punish</I> in secondary literature &mdash; obscures an important modification in Foucault&rsquo;s method and diagnostic style that occurred between the introduction of biopolitics in 1976 (in <I>Society Must Be Defended</I>) and the lectures of 1978 (<I> Security, Territory, Population</I>) and 1979 (<I>Birth of Biopolitics</I>). Foucault&rsquo;s initial analysis of biopolitics was couched in surprisingly epochal and totalizing claims about the characteristic forms of power in modernity. The later lectures, by contrast, suggest what I propose to call a &lsquo;topological&rsquo; analysis that examines the &lsquo;patterns of correlation&rsquo; in which heterogeneous elements &mdash; techniques, material forms, institutional structures and technologies of power &mdash; are configured, as well as the redeployments through which these patterns are transformed. I also indicate how attention to the topological dimension of Foucault&rsquo;s analysis might change our understanding of key themes in his late work: biopolitics, the analysis of thinking, and the concept of governmentality.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collier, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409347694</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Topologies of Power: Foucault's Analysis of Political Government beyond 'Governmentality']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>108</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>78</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/109?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neoliberalism in Action: Inequality, Insecurity and the Reconstitution of the Social]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/109?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper draws from Foucault&rsquo;s analysis of liberalism and neoliberalism to reconstruct the mechanisms and the means whereby neoliberalism has transformed society into an &lsquo;enterprise society&rsquo; based on the market, competition, inequality, and the privilege of the individual. It highlights the role of financialization, neglected by Foucault, as a key apparatus in achieving this transformation. It elaborates the strategies of individualization, insecuritization and depoliticization used as part of neoliberal social policy to undermine the principles and practices of mutualization and redistribution that the Welfare State and Fordism had promoted. It shows that the aim of neoliberal politics is the restoration of the power of capital to determine the distribution of wealth and to establish the enterprise as dominant form; this requires that it target society as a whole for a fundamental reconstruction, putting in place new mechanisms to control individual conduct. The analysis refers to the case of workers in the culture industry to illustrate the operation of these mechanisms in practice. It also outlines the main elements of the analytical apparatus that makes visible the new role of the state as an ensemble of apparatuses constituting the conditions for neoliberal market capitalism and the new type of individual appropriate for it. The paper thus adds a new dimension to Foucault&rsquo;s analysis.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazzarato, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409350283</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neoliberalism in Action: Inequality, Insecurity and the Reconstitution of the Social]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>133</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/134?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Shadows of Atheology: Epidemics, Power and Life after Foucault]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/134?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This essay examines a hidden link in biopolitical thinking after Foucault &mdash; the relation between biology and theology. The result is a turn away from the dichotomy of life/death and towards a life-after-life, an afterlife that is vitalist, networked and immanent. The model for this, however, is not in postmodernity but in the pre-modernity of medicine, plague and demonology.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thacker, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409347698</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Shadows of Atheology: Epidemics, Power and Life after Foucault]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>134</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[National Enterprise Emergency: Steps Toward an Ecology of Powers]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The figure of today&rsquo;s threat is the suddenly irrupting, locally self-organizing, systemically self-amplifying threat of large-scale disruption. This form of threat, fed by instability and metastability, is not only indiscriminate, it is also indiscrimin<I> able</I>; it is indistinguishable from the general environment. The figure of the environment shifts: from the harmony of a natural balance to the normality of a generalized crisis environment so encompassing in its endemic threat-form as to connect, across the spectrum, the polar extremes of war and the weather. Michel Foucault characterizes the dominant contemporary regime of power, coincident with the rise of neoliberalism, as &lsquo;environmental&rsquo;: a governmentality which will act on the environment and systematically modify its variables. Its actions, he emphasizes, are not standardizing since the shift in the figure of the environment has moved it out of reach of normalization. Given the indiscriminateness of the environment&rsquo;s autonomous activity, environmentality must work through the &lsquo;regulation of effects&rsquo; rather than of causes. It must remain operationally &lsquo;open to unknowns&rsquo; and catch nonlinear, transversal phenomena before they amplify the stirrings to actual crisis proportions. What systematicity is this? And: does power&rsquo;s becoming-environmental mean that, politically, we are dealing with natural subjects? Where Foucault&rsquo;s question ends is where, today, we must begin, in light of how the recomposition of power whose dawning he glimpsed in 1979 has since played out. In the context of Foucault&rsquo;s theories of power, the question amounts to asking: is this still &lsquo;biopolitics&rsquo;?</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massumi, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409347696</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[National Enterprise Emergency: Steps Toward an Ecology of Powers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>185</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/186?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rethinking Biopolitics, Race and Power in the Wake of Foucault]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/186?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article examines the ambivalences in Foucault&rsquo;s elaboration of the concept of biopower and biopolitics. From the beginning, he relates the idea of a power over life to struggle and war, and so to race. In the period of the formation of the nation-state, threats to the unity and strength of the population were thought to come from a contagion by an alien element. In this context, tropes of race became aligned with the &lsquo;sciences and technologies of the social&rsquo; that were emerging as part of biopolitics. They became part of the new rationality of the state, finding expression in projects such as public hygiene and eugenics, and, at the extreme, in Nazism.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Macey, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409349278</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rethinking Biopolitics, Race and Power in the Wake of Foucault]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>205</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/206?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neoliberal Political Economy, Biopolitics and Colonialism: A Transcolonial Genealogy of Inequality]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/206?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Foucault&rsquo;s analysis of the relation of power and the economy in the lectures given at the Coll&egrave;ge de France between 1975 and 1979 opens up modern societies for a radically different interrogation of the relations of force inscribed in historically heterogeneous forms of wealth creation and distribution, but more specifically within the period of liberal capitalism. Its vast scope clears the ground for genealogies of power, political economy and race that demonstrate their intertwinement, yet he underplays several elements which have been central for the institution of the political economy of liberal capitalism, particularly regarding colonial expansion and subjugation, the prior existence of trade and other networks operating on a world scale, and politico-economic and technical developments, such as banking and finance, that acted as conditions of possibility. By redressing the balance, this article outlines a different genealogy of the emergence of biopolitics and the mechanisms supporting global capitalism, making visible the constitutive role of colonialism. It suggests elements for a more fundamental critique of inequality, one that relays the Foucaldian themes of economy, territory, security, population and race according to a longer periodization that reveals most economies to have been zero-sum games of &lsquo;winners&rsquo; and &lsquo;losers&rsquo;. Transcending this situation requires a radically different, transcolonial and transindividual understanding of the essentially collaborative and co-implicate character of the production of all life. The implications mean the rejection of ontologies that support not only neoliberalism but other forms of dispossession and pauperization, often allied to the hierarchization of difference, opening the way for a different history of the present and for imagining new economies and socialities.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venn, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409352194</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neoliberal Political Economy, Biopolitics and Colonialism: A Transcolonial Genealogy of Inequality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>233</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/234?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Another Life: The Nature of Political Economy in Foucault's Genealogy of Biopolitics]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/6/234?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The article focuses on the relation established by Foucault in the two lecture courses <I>Security, Territory, Population</I> and <I>The Birth of Biopolitics</I> between life, nature and political economy. It explores the ways in which liberalism constructs a notion of economic nature as a phenomenon of circulation of aleatory series of events and poses the latter as an internal limit to sovereign power. It argues that the entwinement of vital and economic processes provides the means of internal redefinition of the <I>raison d&rsquo;&Eacute;tat</I> and uses such an explanation to understand the emergence of the network topos as a technology of regulation of the unstable co-causality of milieus of circulation. The article also follows Foucault&rsquo;s argument that the neoliberal market is significantly different from the liberal market inasmuch as, unlike the latter, it is not defined as an abstract logic of exchange among equals but as an ideal logic of competition between formal inequalities. Finally it asks whether new theories of social production and sympathetic cooperation, in the work of authors such as Yochai Benkler and Maurizio Lazzarato, can offer an alternative to the neoliberal logic of market-based competition as the basis for the production of new forms of life.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terranova, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409352193</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Another Life: The Nature of Political Economy in Foucault's Genealogy of Biopolitics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/6/263?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Thanks to Reviewers]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/6/263?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409356375</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Thanks to Reviewers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>266</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/6/267?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Calls for Papers]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/6/267?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:34:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/02632764090260061401</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Calls for Papers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>268</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Capitalizing Disease: Biopolitics of Drug Trials in India]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Recent success of Indian engineers, businessmen, as well as other technically qualified professionals has created an obsession with knowledge and creativity. Documents like <I> India as a Knowledge Superpower</I> have proliferated and we continually hear the mantra of investing in and harnessing of human capital. There are, however, several strands of human capital in India and not all of them harness knowledge and creativity. People on whom drugs are being tested represent one such human capital, which, even though it is being energetically mobilized to provide India with a strategic advantage in the world market, also highlights the contradictions within India&rsquo;s shifting imaginary, economy and politics. Drug trials in India, in the context of neoliberal globalization, not only challenge and complicate, but also operate within a constellation of divisions &mdash; labor/capital, west/non-west, colonial/sovereign, national/global and so on. In this article I analyze how the people on whom drug testing is being done in India are being &lsquo;harnessed&rsquo; as human capital, which leads to politicization of &lsquo;bare life&rsquo; through &lsquo;inclusive-exclusion&rsquo;.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prasad, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:34:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409106347</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Capitalizing Disease: Biopolitics of Drug Trials in India]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>29</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/30?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Resurrection of the Image]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/30?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article I wish to elucidate a form of receptivity in our relation to televisual images that cannot be reduced to the postmodern formula of a closed circuit of desire through which the self(same) infinitely reproduces itself. Through analysis of the peculiar experience of viewing Gore Verbinski&rsquo;s 2003 film <I> The Ring</I> (a remake of Hideo Nakata&rsquo;s <I>Ring</I>), I argue for the possibility of an experience of alterity in and through the televisual. I pair this event with the religious experience of viewing the icon that Jean-Luc Marion opposes to the televisual in his recent works collected in <I>The Crossing of the Visible</I>. The purpose of the comparison is not to conflate the two experiences but rather to suggest that the possibility for reclaiming a space for difference in a postmodern world lies within the televisual itself, the very medium that Marion credits with the bankruptcy of the aesthetic. In <I>The Ring</I>, the process through which the viewer expects to see her own desire reproduced is violently interrupted by a vengeful image that shatters the mirror of reflection between viewer and viewed and threatens to cross over that threshold &mdash; to cross the visible, in Marion&rsquo;s terms.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:34:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409106348</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Resurrection of the Image]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>43</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>30</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/44?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Another Politics of Life is Possible]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/44?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Although it is usually assumed that in Michel Foucault&rsquo;s work biopolitics is a politics which has life for its object, a closer analysis of the courses he gave at the Coll&egrave;ge de France on this topic, as well as of the other seminars and papers of this period, shows that he took a quite different direction, restricting it to the regulation of population. The aim of this article is to return to the origins of the concept and to confront the issue of life as such. This implies four shifts with respect to Foucault&rsquo;s theory: (1) Politics is not only about the rules of the game of governing, but also about its stakes. (2) More than the power over life, contemporary societies are characterized by the legitimacy they attach to life. (3) Rather than a normalizing process, the intervention in lives is a production of inequalities. (4) The politics of life, then, is not only a question of governmentality and technologies, but also of meaning and values. The discussion is grounded on a series of empirical investigations conducted in France and South Africa on how life and lives are treated in our world.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fassin, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:34:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409106349</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Another Politics of Life is Possible]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>60</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>44</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/61?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is the World Social Forum a Transnational Public Sphere?: Nancy Fraser, Critical Theory and the Containment of Radical Possibility]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/61?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In a number of recent articles, Nancy Fraser attempts to understand the World Social Forum within the framework of critical democratic theory. In this article, we examine the descriptive and normative aspects of Fraser&rsquo;s theoretical framework, and explore the effects of projecting it upon the World Social Forum. We argue that while this theory may elucidate some features of the Forum, many of the Forum&rsquo;s most challenging and innovative aspects are obscured and limited by Fraser&rsquo;s framework. Not only, then, does the World Social Forum elude Fraser&rsquo;s conceptualization of it, but we suggest that the praxis of the Forum poses a number of serious challenges to Fraser&rsquo;s critical theory of democracy and social justice.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conway, J., Singh, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:34:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409106350</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is the World Social Forum a Transnational Public Sphere?: Nancy Fraser, Critical Theory and the Containment of Radical Possibility]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>61</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Sociology of Vocational Prizes: Recognition as Esteem]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Artistic and scientific activities pertain to the world of &lsquo;vocation&rsquo;, which demonstrates a close relationship with recognition issues. Referring to recent trends in French, German and American sociology and political philosophy, this article addresses both the status of recognition in present-day sociology and the necessity of prizes in vocational activities. Grounded on two empirical surveys about literary and scientific prizes, it displays the various axiological problems raised by such a mode of recognition, as the &lsquo;felicity conditions&rsquo; of this mode of recognition have to ensure a feeling of justice and avoid envious reactions. On a more theoretical ground, the article aims to demonstrate the necessity for sociology to shift, first, from material to &lsquo;symbolic&rsquo; or, rather, &lsquo;intangible&rsquo; outcomes; second, from a concern with power and domination to a concern with interdependency; and third, from recognition conceived as egalitarian respect to recognition conceived as un-egalitarian esteem.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heinich, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:34:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409106352</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Sociology of Vocational Prizes: Recognition as Esteem]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/108?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Being-with: Georg Simmel's Sociology of Association]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/108?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The article discusses Georg Simmel&rsquo;s theorizing on the social in the light of his treatment of the &lsquo;dyad&rsquo; and the &lsquo;triad&rsquo;, constellations of two and three elements. What makes the dyad and the triad particularly interesting is the fact that they express the difference between the primary intersubjectivity immanent to the individuals and the objectified social forms in numerical terms, as quantitatively determined. In the article, it is argued that in its basic, methodologically simplest form, the social amounts for Simmel to dyadic interaction <I>between</I> I and you, that can be conceptualized as &lsquo;beingwith&rsquo;. Nevertheless, a third element is always included also in the dyad, be it only as an excluded third. Therefore, it is claimed that in order to fully understand the dynamics of social relationships, one must look at the interplay of two socio-logics, bivalent and trivalent. The &lsquo;third&rsquo; not only interrupts the supposedly immediate relation between the two elements of the dyad, but it is also capable of transforming it into a completely new figure: a social whole, a &lsquo;we&rsquo;, which obtains a supra-individual life independent of the individuals.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pyyhtinen, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:34:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409106353</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Being-with: Georg Simmel's Sociology of Association]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>128</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/129?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What is a Pipe?: Obama and the Sociological Imagination]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/129?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article is an attempt to make sociological sense of the 2008 American election &mdash; particularly of the phenomenological observation of extraordinary enchantment and almost amorous attraction which unlikely members of the American population displayed for Obama, from the early days of the campaign onward. I draw on charisma theory to argue that sociology has something surprising to say on the phenomenon, and on the metaphor of the pipe to add detail about the technology of attraction that was in play.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cetina, K. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:34:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409106354</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What is a Pipe?: Obama and the Sociological Imagination]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>140</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>129</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/141?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[After the Ball Is Over: Bourdieu and the Crisis of Peasant Society]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/141?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This review article is stimulated by the publication by Polity Press in 2008 of a translation of Bourdieu&rsquo;s <I>Le Bal des c&eacute;libataires</I>, which had been published by Editions du Seuil in the year of his death &mdash; 2002. <I>Le Bal des c&eacute;libataires</I> assembled three articles about his native B&eacute;arn which Bourdieu had written at roughly ten-year intervals, starting in 1962. Given that <I>Le Bal des c&eacute;libataires</I> formally constitutes a new publication in that it juxtaposes the three earlier articles, adds a short introduction and republishes, as an appendix, a methodological article first published in the 1970s, the 2002 text provides access to four stages in the development of Bourdieu&rsquo;s reflexive analysis of traditional society (dating from 1962, 1972, 1989 and 2002). The article draws attention to some of the objective socio-economic changes in B&eacute;arn society in the second half of the 20th century and asks whether the autonomous logic of Bourdieu&rsquo;s conceptual development in this period was the product of his partisan participation in an originally traditional situation and whether his maintenance of this logic over time was a device to give scientific legitimation to that situation. Consideration of these microcosmic analyses of the B&eacute;arn raises questions relevant to international socio-economic development in general, about whether sociology is equipped to offer a scientific explanation of economic and technological changes in society or whether, by definition, it is categorally committed to a conservative value-orientation which criticizes &lsquo;post-human&rsquo; postmodernity.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robbins, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:34:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409106355</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[After the Ball Is Over: Bourdieu and the Crisis of Peasant Society]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>150</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>141</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/5/151?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Who Sings the Nation-State?: Judith Butler and Gayatri Spivak Calcutta, New York, Oxford: Seagull Books, 2007, pp. 121]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/5/151?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bell, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:34:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409106356</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Who Sings the Nation-State?: Judith Butler and Gayatri Spivak Calcutta, New York, Oxford: Seagull Books, 2007, pp. 121]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>156</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>151</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/5/156?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Translation, Biopolitics, Colonial Difference (Traces) edited by Naoki Sakai and Jon Solomon Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2006]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/5/156?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heydon, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:34:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/02632764090260050902</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Translation, Biopolitics, Colonial Difference (Traces) edited by Naoki Sakai and Jon Solomon Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2006]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>158</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>156</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Islam and the New Political Landscape: Faith Communities, Political Participation and Social Change]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article we consider the forms of democratic participation that revolve around issues of religious faith and Islam. The context of such work is one in which a concern with the levels of participation in the political institutions of Western Europe and North America feature prominently in both journalistic and academic debate. The article speaks to debates that are concerned with the efficacy of specific forms of participation. In doing so we argue that we need to think carefully about the forms of social action that constitute participation in the democratic process. We also need to think precisely about definitions of the political with which people engage. If we take <I>the political</I> as a domain in which the ethical settlement of society is contestable, the sorts of mobilization around faith communities that this article describes are clearly a form of political participation. Yet the article argues that the reasons many become involved in these forms of social organization in contemporary East London is precisely because they are seen as less complicit with mainstream political institutions of the British state.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Back, L., Keith, M., Khan, A., Shukra, K., Solomos, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:21:04 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409104965</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Islam and the New Political Landscape: Faith Communities, Political Participation and Social Change]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>23</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/25?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ethics and the Speaking of Things]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/25?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article is about our relationship with things; about the abundant material geographies that surround us and constitute the very possibility for us to be the beings that we are. More specifically, it is about the question of the possibility of an ethical encounter with things (<I>qua</I> things). We argue, with the science and technology studies tradition (and Latour in particular), that we are the beings that we are through our entanglements with things, we are thoroughly hybrid beings, cyborgs through and through &mdash; we have never been otherwise. With Heidegger we propose that a human-centred ethics of hybrids will fail to open a space for an ethical encounter with things since all beings in the sociomaterial network &mdash; humans and non-human alike &mdash; end up circulating as objects, enframed as `standing reserve', things-for-the-purposes-of the network. We suggest that what is needed is an ethos beyond ethics, or the overcoming of an ethics &mdash; which is based on the will to power &mdash; towards an ethos of letting be. We elaborate such a possibility with the help of Heidegger, in particular with reference to the work of Graham Harman and his notion of `tool-being'. From this we propose, very tentatively, an ethos that has as its ground a poetic dwelling with things, a way of being that lets being be (<I>Gelassenheit</I>). We show how such a poetic dwelling, or ethos of <I>Gelassenheit</I>, may constitute the impossible possibility of a very otherwise way of being with things &mdash; an ethos of a `community of those who have nothing in common' as suggested by Alphonso Lingis.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Introna, L. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:21:04 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409104967</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ethics and the Speaking of Things]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>46</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/47?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Too Close to the Money: A Theory of Compulsive Gambling]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/47?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article explores the relationship between gambling and capitalism. The subjective being of the compulsive gambler provides insight into the role of money in capitalism. Using the Lacanian approach of Zizek, money is analysed as a sublime object of capitalist ideology. In gambling, however, the subject engages money in a very direct encounter with the Lacanian `Real', circumventing the ordinary symbolic order of capitalism. This results in a momentary de-sublimation of money, stripping it of the metaphysical properties otherwise vested in it by capitalism. For the compulsive gambler, the de-sublimation has become permanent, making it impossible for him to function as an ordinary capitalist subject. He has come too close to money, leaving him in a pathological state of being out of joint with capitalism.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bjerg, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:21:04 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409104968</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Too Close to the Money: A Theory of Compulsive Gambling]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>66</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/67?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Sociological Understanding of Suicide Attacks]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/67?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last 25 years, suicide attacks have become an alarming threat. They are a political tool which has been adopted by several organizations in Sri Lanka, Palestine and the Occupied Territories, Turkey, Chechnya, Afghanistan, Pakistan and, in particular, by the Al-Qaeda-led insurgency in Iraq in its struggle against the US and its allies. Recent analyses have traced back the use of suicide terrorism to its `strategic logic': organizations and their militants resort to suicide attacks mainly because they view this form of violence as an efficient weapon for their revolutionary and nationalist campaigns. An explanation based on the paradigm of rational choice theory or instrumental rationality alone is, however, insufficient. This article suggests the importance of combining the paradigm of instrumental rationality with that of axiological rationality. Only this kind of explanation is able to clarify the crucial role played by those cultural and symbolic elements which justify and encourage the martyrdom of suicide attackers. Moreover, by adopting a multi-causal analysis of the armed organizations, their constituencies and the attackers, as well as of their interaction, the article outlines a theoretical model of the most important social mechanisms underlying the use of suicide tactics.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tosini, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:21:04 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409104969</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Sociological Understanding of Suicide Attacks]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>96</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/97?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The (Impossible) Society of Spite: Revisiting Nihilism]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/97?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In the primordial scene, which Girard has described, society is constituted on the basis of the lynching mob, whose mimetic desire, envy and egotism culminate in sacrificing the scapegoat. With spite, though, we confront the opposite situation, in which the mimetic desire does not establish but rather destroys `society'. Here everybody, and not only the scapegoat, is threatened with destruction. Regarding the genealogy of spite, the article elaborates on radical nihilism (that is, the will to negation) and relates this to passive nihilism (the negation of the will as such), arguing that these two nihilisms are significant to understand both the hedonism/disorientation that characterizes contemporary post-political culture and the emerging forms of despair and violence as a reaction to it. These two nihilisms constitute a non-dialectical `synthesis' in spite of seemingly antagonistic `disjunctions'. The article concretizes the genealogy of spite with two cases: French bestselling writer Houellebecq's novels and (the war against) terrorism. Then it focuses on the relationship between the three social formations (primitive, despotic and capitalist societies) and spite as an `affect without society'. Finally, agonism as a political virtue is set against spite.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diken, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:21:04 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409104970</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The (Impossible) Society of Spite: Revisiting Nihilism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>116</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/117?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sorcerer's Apprentices and the `Will to Figuration': The Ambiguous Heritage of the College de Sociologie]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/117?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The article deals with Le Coll&egrave;ge de Sociologie, an elective organization founded in 1937 by a group of French thinkers, among whom were Georges Bataille, Roger Caillois and Michel Leiris. It tries to show how the notion of `force' or of `power', constitutive to the `new mythology' the members of the Coll&egrave;ge wanted to create, was in fact deeply ambivalent in nature. This ambivalence can be traced back to the internal ambiguities of the Durkheimian theory of the `collective effervescence', which is shown to have influenced not only the collegians' notion of the sacred, but also their conception of power. This ambiguous theoretical heritage is curiously reflected in the conflicting conceptions Bataille and Caillois held of the notion of power &mdash; one of the major controversies, which later led to the dissolution of the Coll&egrave;ge. The thesis defended here is that the seeds of this controversy lie already in the internal ambiguities of the Durkheimian theory and that these ambivalences were in a certain manner reproduced not only in the dispute between Caillois and Bataille, but also in much of the contemporary social theory drawing its inspiration from the Durkheimian sociology of the sacred.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arppe, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:21:04 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409104971</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sorcerer's Apprentices and the `Will to Figuration': The Ambiguous Heritage of the College de Sociologie]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>145</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/147?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Between the `Media City' and the `City as a Medium': The Media City: Media, Architecture and Urban Space by Scott McQuire Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore: SAGE, 2008]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/147?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article reviews Scott McQuire's book, <I>The Media City</I>, which focuses on the historical formation of the media-architecture complex of the current urban environment. While the book provides rich insights into the ways various media technologies have become interconnected with urban architectural structures, the underlying concept of media in McQuire's discussion could be criticized in three respects: (1) visual-centred, (2) technology-based and (3) real-time oriented. After considering these three points in the context of the theoretical ideas put forward by Henri Lefebvre, Friedrich Kittler and Walter Benjamin, particular attention is paid to Benjamin's prominent figure of the <I>fl&acirc;neur</I>. Through reconsidering the experience of the <I>fl&acirc;neur</I> in terms of the technique of getting lost in the city, possibilities are suggested as to thinking differently about the `media city'. In other words, it is proposed that we should examine the theoretical possibilities concerning the modern urban experience between the `media city' and the `city as a medium'.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chikamori, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:21:04 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409104972</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Between the `Media City' and the `City as a Medium': The Media City: Media, Architecture and Urban Space by Scott McQuire Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore: SAGE, 2008]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>154</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>147</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/155?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Can Biotechnology Do?: Process-events vs the Bio-logic of Life: The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics, and Culture by Eugene Thacker Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/4/155?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This essay is an occasion to discuss the critical trajectories of a now common field of enquiry concerned with the impact of biomediatic technologies on politics and culture. Thacker's book <I>The Global Genome</I> importantly sits between debates about biopower as the governance of life and biopolitics as the transformation of what life can be. In particular, the book advances the hypothesis that as information produces `life itself', so it has become central to a political economy of excess and surplus value. In other words, information does not dematerialize biology. Bioinformatics and biotech informationalize the living and rematerialize biology. As biotech becomes central to biopower, the global genome comes to reigning profit, labour, racism, biocolonialism, biosecurity, and bioart. However, Thacker's reliance on a bio-ontology of life grounding all relations of power leaves no space for process-events to break the chain of life's perpetual reproduction.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parisi, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:21:04 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409104973</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Can Biotechnology Do?: Process-events vs the Bio-logic of Life: The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics, and Culture by Eugene Thacker Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>163</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>155</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/2-3/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ubiquitous Media: An Introduction]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/26/2-3/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Featherstone, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103104</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ubiquitous Media: An Introduction]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>22</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/23?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards an Ontology of Media]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/23?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper addresses the exclusion of physical and technical media from questions of                 ontology. It is argued, first, that from Aristotle onwards ontology has dealt with                 the matter and form of things rather than the relations between things in time and                 space. Second, it is argued that because the Greeks did not distinguish between                 speech elements and alphabetic letters there has been a tendency for philosophy to                 neglect writing as its own technical medium. This paper traces these tendencies                 through a range of philosophical sources: from Aquinas and Descartes to Fichte and                 Hegel. It is argued, by way of response, that it is only with Heidegger that a                 philosophical consciousness for technical media first arose, and that today the                 connections of mathematics and media, and of media and ontology are to be formulated                 in more precise terms.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kittler, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103106</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards an Ontology of Media]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>31</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Teleologics of the Snail: The Errant Self Wired to a WiMax Network]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article, I would like to show that, concerning this era of ubiquitous technology and its teleologics, the stakes concern the constitution of a new milieu of psychic and collective individuation (in Simondon's sense of these terms), which is at least as radically new as the writing of language was in its time; second, I attempt to show that what is at stake relates to the way technology changes the <I> t&eacute;los</I>, that is, the rule of ends which shape the social organization of collective desire as a system of care and remedies; and, third, I argue that this era requires a new libidinal economy, if we admit that there can be no <I>t&eacute;los</I> without desire. I will argue that new ubiquitous digital networks operating as new technical associated milieus have fundamental effects for symbolic and psychical associated milieus, and thus for new ways of being.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stiegler, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103105</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Teleologics of the Snail: The Errant Self Wired to a WiMax Network]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>45</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/47?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[RFID: Human Agency and Meaning in Information-Intensive Environments]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/47?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>RFID tags, small microchips no bigger than grains of rice, are currently being embedded in product labels, clothing, credit cards, and the environment, among other sites. Activated by the appropriate receiver, they transmit information ranging from product information such as manufacturing date, delivery route, and location where the item was purchased to (in the case of credit cards) the name, address, and credit history of the person holding the card. Active RFIDs have the capacity to transmit data without having to be activated by a receiver; they can be linked with embedded sensors to allow continuous monitoring of environmental conditions, applications that interest both environmental groups and the US military. The amount of information accessible through and generated by RFIDs is so huge that it may well overwhelm all existing data sources and become, from the viewpoint of human time limitations, essentially infinite. What to make of these technologies will be interrogated through two contemporary fictions, David Mitchell's <I>Cloud Atlas</I> and Philip K. Dick's <I>Ubik</I> . <I>Cloud Atlas</I> focuses on epistemological questions &mdash; who knows what about whom, in a futuristic society where all citizens wear embedded RFID tags and are subject to constant surveillance. Resistance takes the form not so much of evasion (tactical moves in a complex political Situation) but rather as a struggle to transmit information to present and future stakeholders in a world on the brink of catastrophe. <I>Ubik</I>, by contrast, focuses on deeper ontological questions about the nature of reality itself. Both texts point to the necessity to reconceptualize information as ethical action embedded in contexts and not merely as a quantitative measure of probabilities.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayles, N. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103107</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[RFID: Human Agency and Meaning in Information-Intensive Environments]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/73?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Myth of Media Interactivity: Technology, Communications and Surveillance in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/73?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the 1980s, a number of discourses have celebrated the coming of the information society in Japan. In those discourses, enabling media interactivity has been emphasized as the objective of technological innovations, creating a sort of `myth' of media interactivity. This article tries to investigate the close relationship between media interactivity and surveillance modality in newly emergent information and communication technologies, especially SNS (social networking services) on the Internet. While the traditional image of surveillance society is gloomy and repressive, contemporary, ubiquitous surveillance appears brighter and more fun, since people voluntarily engage with interactive media whilst acknowledging its surveillance modality. In that sense, the logic of surveillance is not merely repressive but also seductive for users of interactive media. Given the rising desire for public security after 9/11, the logic of surveillance is becoming more prevalent and dominant all over the world. With the rise of globalized security, philosophical and social scientific interrogations of security-obsessed contemporary society have become indispensable for critical academic discourse. In order to critically interrogate rising surveillance and media interactivity, this article tries to analyze the liberating potentials of the ideal of hospitality, which is expected to offer a counter-logic against surveillance.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abe, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103119</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Myth of Media Interactivity: Technology, Communications and Surveillance in Japan]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/89?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Cool Brand, Affective Activism and Japanese Youth]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/89?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Japanese youth goods have become globally popular over the past 15 years. Referred to as `cool', their contribution to the national economy has been much hyped under the catchword Japan's `GNC' (gross national cool). While this new national brand is indebted to youth &mdash; youth are the intended consumers for such products and sometimes the creators &mdash; young Japanese today are also chastised for not working hard, failing at school and work, and being insufficiently productive or reproductive. Using the concept of immaterial labor, the article argues that such `J-cool' products as Pok&eacute;mon are both based on, and generative of, a type of socio-power also seen in the very behaviors of youth &mdash; flexible sociality, instantaneous communication, information juggling &mdash; that are so roundly condemned in public discourse. The article examines the contradictions between these two different ways of assessing and calibrating the value of youth today. It also looks at the emergence of youth activism around the very precariousness, for them, of socio-economic conditions of flexibility.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allison, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103118</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Cool Brand, Affective Activism and Japanese Youth]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>111</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/113?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anytime, Anywhere: Tetsuwan Atomu Stickers and the Emergence of Character Merchandizing]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/113?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Japan's first weekly, 30-minute animated TV series, <I>Tetsuwan Atomu</I> (Astro Boy), is not only commonly regarded as the first instance of what is now known as `anime'; it is also regarded as the point of emergence of the commercial phenomenon of character-based merchandizing. Interesting enough, it is not so much <I>Tetsuwan Atomu</I> the TV series as the practice of including Atomu stickers as premiums in the candy maker Meiji Seika's chocolate packages that really ignited the character merchandizing boom. The key to the success of the stickers &mdash; along with the use of the already popular figure of Atomu &mdash; was their ability to be stuck anywhere, and seen anytime. This anytime-anywhere potential of the stickers arguably led to the new communicational media environment and the cross-media connections that characterize the anime system and the force which drives it: the character. Part historical, part theoretical, this article will explore the thesis that it was the `medium' of stickers that led to the development of the character-based multimedia environment that is a key example of &mdash; and perhaps even a precursor to &mdash; the ubiquity of media that is the theme of this journal issue.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steinberg, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103114</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anytime, Anywhere: Tetsuwan Atomu Stickers and the Emergence of Character Merchandizing]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>138</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>113</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/139?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anime Creativity: Characters and Premises in the Quest for Cool Japan]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/139?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article examines ethnographically the production of anime (Japanese animated                 films and TV shows) by focusing on how professional animators use characters and                 dramatic premises to organize their collaborative creativity. In contrast to much of                 the analysis of anime that focuses on the stories of particular media texts, I argue                 that a character-based analysis provides a critical perspective on how anime relates                 to broader transmedia phenomena, from licensed merchandise to fan activities. The                 ideas of characters, premises, and world-settings also specify in greater detail the                 logic of anime production, which too often is glossed as emerging from a generalized                 Japanese culture, as in the ongoing debates about `cool Japan'. I conclude that an                 ethnographic approach to anime production through a focus on characters can offer                 new ways of thinking about what moves across media, what distinguishes anime from                 other media forms, and what gives anime its value.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Condry, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103111</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anime Creativity: Characters and Premises in the Quest for Cool Japan]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>163</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/165?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Women's Games in Japan: Gendered Identity and Narrative Construction]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/165?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Women's games refers to a category of games developed and marketed exclusively for the consumption of women and girls in the Japanese gaming industry. Essentially gender-specific games comparable to the `games for girls' proposed by the girls' game movement in the USA, Japanese women's games are significant for their history, influence and function as a site for female gamers to play out various female identities and romantic fantasies within diverse generic structures. This article will first review previous research and literature on women and gaming, analyze the key issues raised in the discourse concerning femininity and electronic games, outline the history and development of women's games, explain how multiple factors contributed to the appeal of women's games by analyzing the games <I>Angelique</I> and <I>Harukanaru Tokino Nakade3</I> and, lastly, discuss the meaning and significance of women's games in the larger context of women and gaming. The 1994 game <I>Angelique</I> succeeded in establishing a loyal and close-knit fan base by actively utilizing popular female culture such as <I>shoujo manga</I> (girls' comics) and the fan base for voice actors. <I> Angelique</I> also set up the specifics and conventions of women's games: a focus on romance, easy controls and utilizing other multimedia. In 2004, <I> Harukanaru Tokino Nakade3</I> deconstructed the genre and gender conventions of women's games and shoujo manga, while developing a new type of feminine identity and narrative. Women's games indicate that genderspecific games can be more than educational tools to familiarize girls with technology or perpetuate stereotypes; they can be a significant extension of female culture into the realm of gaming, and contribute to the development of women's culture and the diversification of the gaming industry.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103132</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Women's Games in Japan: Gendered Identity and Narrative Construction]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>188</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Love in the Time of Tamagotchi]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a popular conception among many Zeitgeist watchers, especially in places like the US, Western Europe and Australia, of the urbanized East as existing somehow further into the future. As William Gibson once stated: `The future is here; it just isn't equally distributed yet.' This kind of cultural fetishism extends to not only technolust, but the practices that new gadgets and electronics encourage. The specific phenomenon explored in this article is that of virtual girlfriends and boyfriends: whether in the form of avatars or automated SMS text messages. This particularly Japanese `craze', if we can call it that, fascinates and appals people who still hold P2P romance IRL in high-esteem. It seems like an insult to the intrinsically human and humanist discourse of courtship; and indeed it is. How does this perspective change, however, if we consider `love' as a technology? That is, as both a code with its own algorithmic parameters, and a discourse that also challenges the hyper-rational assumptions of the `merely machinic'. Extending the argument articulated in my book, Love and Other Technologies, this article asks how the emergence of virtual dating and other techno-inflected treatments of romance are working to undo our jealously held notions of intimacy and identity. It concludes that all sex can be considered cybersex, given the communication flows that occur both before, during and after the act. For, as we continue to enframe the discourse of intimacy via new and mobile media, we find it increasingly difficult to deny that intensified inter-subjectivity is always already a matter of technics. Indeed, what Heidegger says of modern technology can effectively be applied to modern love: that it embodies an `unreasonable demand' of nature (and thus has the capacity to reveal something essential about the posthuman condition).</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pettman, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103117</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Love in the Time of Tamagotchi]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>208</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Love Messaging: Mobile Phone Txting Seen Through the Lens of Tanka Poetry]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The article examines the nature of mobile phone text messaging, or `txting', in the context of a discourse of love. It draws links between the txt message and the much older, revered form of love messaging, Japanese tanka poetry. In cutting across both a historical and technological divide, it seeks to elucidate a more subtle understanding of how text messaging &mdash; from a literary perspective &mdash; plays its part in amorous exchange and argues how it has the capacity to enable individuals to affirm their own private thoughts, feelings and anxieties. Taking a cue from Michel Foucault's late work, concerned with the philosophical precept of `care of the self', the article argues that these differing forms of exchange &mdash; as `tender' technologies of the self and inter-subjectivity &mdash; go beyond any one medium or age of media. Aspects of our relationships are worked out in the silent confines of being alone with text and, in the case today, with text messaging, making for the potential of a new poetics of time and space. While we cannot free ourselves from the lover's code or discourse, there is the potential for an affirmation of our part in its production, which prompts a question about how we might go on to research the currently missing archive of text messaging.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manghani, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103130</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Love Messaging: Mobile Phone Txting Seen Through the Lens of Tanka Poetry]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>232</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/233?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Japan's Bifurcated Modernity: Writing and Calligraphy in Japanese Public Schools, 1872--1943]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/233?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Interwar Japan saw the rise of a generation of intellectuals, bureaucrats, and                 educators who were uneasy about modern life. One expression of this malaise was the                 introduction of calligraphy in the 1941 and 1943 school curricula. Calligraphy                 injected aesthetics into writing education. Yet it also compromised the speed and                 efficiency of writing, which lay at the core of Japan's system of modern education.                 The solution was to teach writing twice, once as an art in the `art section' and                 once as a functional skill in the `language section'. As an art, writing was a means                 to cultivate the spirit, discipline the body, escape from the calculated logic of                 linear time and produce an aesthetic epiphany. As a functional tool, it was a skill                 for keeping pace with the demands of the modern world by communicating meaning                 quickly and efficiently. Bureaucrats and educators from 1941 were thus                 simultaneously engaged in the task of overcoming modernity on the one hand and of                 instilling proficiency in modern life on the other. This duality of the word as a                 functional code for transmitting meaning and the word as an aesthetic form both                 echoed and shaped the double nature of Japan's modernity.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adal, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103127</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Japan's Bifurcated Modernity: Writing and Calligraphy in Japanese Public Schools, 1872--1943]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>247</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/249?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ernest Fenollosa's Etymosinology in the Age of Global Communication]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/249?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article puts forward the thesis that in the age of multiculturalism, global communication is rooted in cross-cultural understanding as shown in McLuhan's late communication theory. The American philosopher Ernest Fenollosa went to Japan during the Meiji Restoration when it started in earnest full-scale Westernization. He became fascinated with the poetics of sinography manifested in etymosinology. Etymosinology reveals the depth of the Sinic cultural soul, which is this-worldly, practical, concrete and specific. Sinism (i.e. Confucianism, Daoism and Chan/Zen Buddhism) is a species of relational ontology which is predicated upon the conception of reality as social process. This social process is always already embodied. With the aid of Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of embodiment, I critically explore and examine the connection between embodiment and `new media' theory.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jung, H. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103129</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ernest Fenollosa's Etymosinology in the Age of Global Communication]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>273</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/275?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Thoughts Not Our Own: Whatever Happened to Selective Attention?]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/275?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There are now many important contributions to the scientific study of the brain-mind continuum. These results come both from research into non-ordinary states of consciousness and into the brain's intrinsic, largely unconscious mechanisms. The larger potential of such investigations consists precisely in making the parameters of our cognitive system apparent. But they also reveal the socio-cultural uses to which these parameters are currently, or in the foreseeable future, being applied. This article wrestles with that fact. Specifically, it examines the implications for those of us interested in the dynamics of visual awareness and the structural and phenomenological aspects of noticing. Because some of the key characteristics of consciousness are so ingrained that we are usually blind to them, it is all the more important to understand how and why we pay attention to certain features of our environment. Subjective consciousness pertains to the realm of inner experience as well as focusing on the external world. What Daniel Dennett terms `intentionality' or directedness towards an object is a sign of our connectedness to the outside world. Beyond connection, I am interested in how complex works of art help us cognize, confer reality, or have knowledge of what lies before our eyes. I will argue that this calibration of the agent's experience and her perception of the world is under threat today.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stafford, B. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103108</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Thoughts Not Our Own: Whatever Happened to Selective Attention?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>293</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/294?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Living (with) Technical Time: From Media Surrogacy to Distributed Cognition]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/294?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article proposes that time is not so much constituted by time-consciousness as given by technical inscriptions of time (including those performed by time-consciousness). The `digital gift' of time that comprises one fundamental mode of this giving of time correlates with Aristotle's conception of time as `the number of movement according to the before and after'; more specifically, it furnishes a minimal form of temporal difference &mdash; a minimal before-after structure &mdash; that proves useful for exploring how the experience of time has changed today. The article argues that we increasingly live time not, as philosopher Bernard Stiegler argues, through neo-Husserlian temporal objects like the cinema that model the flow of time through our consciousnesses (or our brains), but rather with the aid of artworks that eschew the objectal in favor of the processual. In works like Wolfgang Staehle's <I>Empire 24/7</I>, Pierre Huyghe's <I>L'Ellipse</I> and Lynn Kirby's <I>Six Shooter</I>, we confront open-ended digital structures that provide us with a technically-specific mediation of the minimal before-after structure and allow us to participate in more heterogeneous enframings of time that move beyond the temporal ratios of human perception. The article closes with a brief discussion of contemporary Chinese art that serves to broaden the proposed `digital aesthetic' of time beyond the `digital' construed narrowly as a concrete technical platform.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hansen, M. B.N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103109</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Living (with) Technical Time: From Media Surrogacy to Distributed Cognition]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>315</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>294</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/316?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fiction and the `Unrepresentable': All Movies are but Variants on the Silent Film]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/316?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article I argue that basic characteristics of the medium of cinema formed during the relatively brief era of silent movies continued to characterize film throughout the 20th century. Despite the development of talkies in the 1920s, sound was never truly integrated into the composition of cinema in the sense implied by the term `audiovisual'. This is a reflection not only of technological constraints but also of a fundamental ideological orientation that prohibited the direct representation of the voice. This `prohibition' of the voice is not a phenomenon confined entirely to cinema. Through a critique of the debate begun by Godard and Lanzmann on representation of the Auschwitz gas chambers in film, I consider how the issue of the `unrepresentable' must be extended beyond the issue of visual representation so as to also include the matter of representation in sound. It is only now that we have entered the 21st century that the `visibility' of this larger issue of representation is presented to us.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hasumi, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fiction and the `Unrepresentable': All Movies are but Variants on the Silent Film]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>329</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/330?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Touch, Time and Technics: Levinas and the Ethics of Haptic Communications]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/330?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The development of immersive media-communication environments, and their theorization in terms of the `haptic', calls for a reconsideration of the relationship between sensuality and the ethics of contact. For the most part, the cultural theorization of the virtual which remains preoccupied with the visual has tended to limit its scope to the paradoxes, politics and ethics of representation. Much of media and cultural studies work, for instance, has adopted, directly or indirectly, the traditional visual and ocularcentric paradigm in its analyses of cultural forms and technologies as these have become integrated into contemporary life. Whilst it has been argued, for instance by Mark Hansen in his recent books, that this paradigm is inadequate to digital media and the developments of human-machine interactions the digital introduces, few comentators have addressed how new developments in immersive sensory media environments bear on the ethics of communication. By way of a reflection on the themes of the tactility of contact and the ethics of touch in the work of Emmanuel Levinas, this article critically evaluates the ethical significance of the `sensory extension' haptic media represent. It identifies and argues against the neo-positivist tendency of Hansen's reliance on the empiricism of the neurosciences whilst locating the resources for an ethics of touch in Levinas' concept of time as `diachrony'.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boothroyd, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103123</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Touch, Time and Technics: Levinas and the Ethics of Haptic Communications]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>345</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>330</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/346?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Symbiotic Architecture: Prehending Digitality]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/2-3/346?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article tackles an old, classical problem, which is acquiring a new epochal relevance with the techno-aesthetic processing of form and substance, expression and content. The field of digital architecture is embarked in the ancient controversy between the line and the curve, binary communication and fuzzy logic. Since the 1990s, the speculative qualities of digital architecture have exposed spatial design to the qualities of growing or breeding, rather than planning. However, such qualities still deploy the tension between discrete spaces and continual curving. In this context, the article suggests the computational coexistence of discrete coding with continual morphing, defying any easy resolution for an aesthetic of continuity or discontinuity, the superiority of the analog or the meta-logic of the digital. The metaphysical dimension of such coexistence needs to include the abstract capacities of experiencing the transition from one state to another as the registering of algorithmic processing. Computation is intrinsic to microperceptions, incomputable quantities deploying the infectious property of the digital code. The article draws on the digital architecture of Greg Lynn to explore whether the computational nature of the digital calculus has the potential to challenge the bifurcation between the biological and the mathematical, the physical and the mental.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parisi, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:43:44 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276409103121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Symbiotic Architecture: Prehending Digitality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>374</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>346</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>