<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com">
<title>Theory, Culture &amp; Society recent issues</title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Theory, Culture &amp; Society RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Theory, Culture &amp; Society</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0263-2764</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/20?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/30?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/56?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/104?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/123?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/5/142?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/5/145?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/5/152?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/4/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/15?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/31?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/77?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/91?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/119?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/139?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/17?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/53?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/71?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/89?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/103?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/51?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/87?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/127?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/157?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/161?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://tcs.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Theory, Culture &amp; Society</title>
<url>http://tcs.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Iconic Experience in Art and Life: Surface/Depth Beginning with Giacometti's Standing Woman]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article examines a key question emerging from the strong program in cultural sociology &mdash; can art provide a window into social life? An examination of Giacometti's <I> Standing Woman</I> shows that art attempts to express cultural structures via immersion into and through the material surfaces of aesthetic form. Through an analysis of the iconic significance of family photos, furniture and celebrities, the article goes on to suggest that such iconic experience remains at the basis of contemporary social life. It explains how we feel part of our surroundings, how we experience the ties that bind us to the people we know and how we develop a feeling for cultural hierarchy.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408095213</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Iconic Experience in Art and Life: Surface/Depth Beginning with Giacometti's Standing Woman]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>19</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/20?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Brief Note on Giacometti]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/20?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Giacometti's work is not comforting. Whether it is seen as driven by abandonment of faith in history, or the surrealist recognition that everything is part of pitiless connection and transmutation, the role of Giacometti's self-understanding in the critical and popular reception of his work is highly significant, and perhaps not sufficiently challenged. Through short discussions of the commentaries on Giacometti's work, by Krauss, Sartre, Sylvester and Danto, and using contrasts with other 20th-century art, it is suggested that the search for the meaning and explanation of the specific creative works in the artist's subjectivity, while very often providing fascinating and invaluable narratives, cannot be taken as an adequate foundation for aesthetic understanding.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boyne, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408095214</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Brief Note on Giacometti]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>29</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/30?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PowerPoint in Public: Digital Technologies and the New Morphology of Demonstration]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/30?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>When policy issues involve complex technical questions, demonstrations are more likely to marshal charts, graphs, models, and simulations than to mobilize popular movements in the streets. In this paper we analyze PowerPoint demonstrations, the most ubiquitous form of digital demonstrations. Our first set of demonstrations are the PowerPoint presentations made in December 2002 by the seven finalist architectural teams in the Innovative Design competition for rebuilding the World Trade Center. Our second case occurred some blocks away, several months later: Colin Powell's PowerPoint demonstration at the United Nations. We argue that Edward Tufte's denunciation of PowerPoint does not capture the cognitive style made possible by the affordances of this pervasive new technology. On the basis of our case materials, we demonstrate the distinctive morphology of PowerPoint. Its digital character provides affordances (1) that allow heterogeneous materials to be seamlessly re-presented in a single format that (2) can morph easily from live demonstration to circulating digital documents that (3) can be utilized in counter-demonstrations. A careful examination of this widely used technology is critical for understanding public discourse in a democratic society.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stark, D., Paravel, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408095215</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PowerPoint in Public: Digital Technologies and the New Morphology of Demonstration]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>55</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>30</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/56?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Militarization of US Higher Education after 9/11]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/56?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Subject to severe financial constraints while operating within a regime of moral panics driven by the `war on terrorism', higher education in the United States faces both a legitimation crisis and a political crisis. With its increasing reliance on Pentagon and corporate interests, the academy has largely opened its doors to serving private and governmental interests and in doing so has compromised its role as a democratic public sphere. This article situates the development of the university as a militarized knowledge factory within the broader context of what I call <I>the biopolitics of militarization</I> and its increasing influence and power within American society after the tragic events of September 11, 2001. Highlighting and critically engaging the specific ways in which the forces of militarization are shaping various aspects of university life, this article focuses on the growth of militarized knowledge and research, the increasing development of academic programs and schools that serve military personnel, and the ongoing production of military values and subject positions on US campuses. It also charts how the alliance between the university and the national security state has undermined the university as a site of criticism, dissent and critical dialogue.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giroux, H. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408095216</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Militarization of US Higher Education after 9/11]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>82</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>56</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Agamben at Ground Zero: A Memorial without Content]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/83?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Construction has recently begun on Michael Arad and Peter Walker's `Reflecting Absence' 9/11 memorial in New York. The design, with its emphasis on traumatic absences and silent contemplation, has moved from selection to construction with relatively little public debate, an indication of a problematic creative and critical consensus forming around contemporary memorial aesthetics. The article seeks to re-open this critical discussion by turning to the philosophy of aesthetics, poetics and language developed by Giorgio Agamben. Agamben reminds us of the classical Greek association of art to poiesis, a passive act of bringing into being, rather than praxis, the active expression of the artist's creative will. Taking this distinction as his starting point, Agamben develops a theory of aesthetics that is neither a modernist embrace of nihilism nor a conservative call for a return to the classical pursuit of universal truths. Agamben posits instead an art concerned not with the transmission of any particular content, but with the task of transmission itself. For Agamben it is the potentiality of the event of language, a kind of pure communicability, that is the ground for our common belonging in the world. Agamben's theories of poetics and language may help us imagine a Ground Zero memorial that moves beyond a strictly didactic or therapeutic role and seeks instead to bring into being a radical space of communication.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McKim, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408095217</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Agamben at Ground Zero: A Memorial without Content]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>103</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/104?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[`The End of the Monarchy of Sex': Sexuality and Contemporary Nihilism]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/104?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The hegemonic form of contemporary queer theory is dependent on a model of desire as autonomous and deregulated, derived from post-'68 French theory and particularly the work of Michel Foucault. Such a model is at risk of finding itself in congruence with a deregulated post-Fordist capitalism that recuperates supposedly dissident sexual identities. This article returns to the work of Foucault to identify a largely unacknowledged tendency in his work that contests the valorization of sexuality and calls for an `end of the monarchy of sex'. This possibility is linked to Foucault's controversial exploration of the concept of `spiritual politics' through his engagement with the Iranian revolution. Rather than regarding this as a regression into a reactionary religiosity, I argue that it forms an inquiry into new political possibilities of revolt. These possibilities contest what Alain Badiou has identified as the nihilism of contemporary capitalism, in which desire and sexuality are deployed to constrain the political imagination to a limited bodily `materialism'. Drawing on the work of the later Foucault, it becomes possible to develop this new politics around asceticism, which is not so much withdrawal from the world but the refusal of the mediations of identity through sexuality and the body.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noys, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408095218</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[`The End of the Monarchy of Sex': Sexuality and Contemporary Nihilism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>122</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/123?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Making a Case for Multiculture: From the `Politics of Piety' to the Politics of the Secular?]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/5/123?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The horror of 7/7 and the radicalization of young British Muslims have prompted a flurry of obituaries gleefully chronicling the demise of multiculturalism. This article turns the clock back to revisit Bhikhu Parekh's <I>Rethinking Multiculturalism</I>, the scholarly cousin of the report by the Runnymede Commission on <I>The Future of Multi-ethnic Britain</I>, both published in 2000. It argues that multiculturalism has never been as universally acceptable as recent critiques would lead us to believe, but also that philosophical multiculturalism (of which Parekh's is totemic) is the unfortunate victim of a lazy conflation with political multiculturalism. While Parekh's multiculturalism is worryingly sympathetic to the prevailing management of cultural diversity, it also illuminates the orthodox Left's elective disengagement with questions of culture, ethnicity and religion. Recent events have brought home the message that neglecting the complexity of belonging only strengthens the impulse for sectarian collectivism. They awaken us to the fact that Britain's emerging political actors will be multiculturalism's children: citizens who refract their interests through the lens of their inherited cultures. The question is whether we constitute the fact of cultural diversity as a full stop, as Parekh does, or whether we creatively seize it to enable `multicultures' of social justice, as this article advocates.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pathak, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408095219</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Making a Case for Multiculture: From the `Politics of Piety' to the Politics of the Secular?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>141</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>123</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/5/142?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Visceral Cosmopolitanism: Gender, Culture and the Normalisation of Difference by Mica Nava Oxford: Berg, 2007]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/5/142?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomlinson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408095220</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Visceral Cosmopolitanism: Gender, Culture and the Normalisation of Difference by Mica Nava Oxford: Berg, 2007]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>145</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/5/145?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts by N. Katherine Hayles Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/5/145?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mackenzie, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/02632764080250050802</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts by N. Katherine Hayles Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>145</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/5/152?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Beyond Gated Politics: Reflections for the Possibility of Democracy by Romand Coles Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/5/152?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patomaki, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/02632764080250050803</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Beyond Gated Politics: Reflections for the Possibility of Democracy by Romand Coles Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>158</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>152</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/4/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introduction to Special Section on A.N. Whitehead]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/4/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Halewood, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408092079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introduction to Special Section on A.N. Whitehead]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>14</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/15?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstract Experience]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/15?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The speculative philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead offers critical social and cultural theory an unusual way of rethinking the place and value of experience in its concerns. This article explores the challenges that Whitehead's approach to experience, deliberately contrasted with the subject-object thinking of modernity, creates. The article seeks to provide an account of the importance of Whitehead's appeal to na&iuml;ve experience and of how this appeal counters some of the problems of more recent and more familiar accounts of the fate of experience which draw on some of the same historical points of reference &mdash; especially Romantic poetry. In particular, the article suggests that Whitehead's broadly impersonal conception of the open structure of experience as constructive process mitigates the `pathos of finitude' attendant upon critical accounts which presume the unity of experience and then ask how this unity is shattered under modernity. Whitehead's work is situated transversally to analysis and phenomenology and is argued to accord a value to and role for abstraction which calls for a more experimental approach to the topic. While `na&iuml;ve experience' clearly differs from the understanding of experience evident in other accounts, the article also suggests that it is not incompatible with a more Foucauldian kind of singular history.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goffey, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408091980</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstract Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>30</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/31?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Being a Sociologist and Becoming a Whiteheadian: Toward a Concrescent Methodology]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/31?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article is an attempt to operationalize A.N. Whitehead's ontological approach within sociology. Whitehead offers lessons and clues to a way of re-envisioning `sociological practice' so that it captures something of the nature of a `social' that is at once real and constructed, material and cultural, and processual and actual. In the course of the article, the terms `operationalize' and `sociology' will themselves be transformed, not least because the range of objects and relations of study will far outstrip those common to sociology; further, the term `operationalize' would seem to retain the notion of a stable sociologist-subject translating precepts into methods. So, the article will follow Whitehead's shift in emphasis toward an understanding of much more relational, heterogeneous and emergent entities &mdash; which in turn will require new methodological approaches. In staking out these claims, we follow in an intellectual lineage in which Whitehead's presence has been profound but generally oblique. For it is clear that, while Whitehead has informed various writing, little attempt has been made to draw out, more or less systematically, some of the general methodological tactics that would allow us to practise a Whiteheadian sociology.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Halewood, M., Michael, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408091981</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Being a Sociologist and Becoming a Whiteheadian: Toward a Concrescent Methodology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>31</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Culture of Abstraction]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Focusing especially on <I> Science and the Modern World</I>, this article explores Whitehead's understanding of the social contexts and repercussions of mathematical and scientific abstraction. It investigates his remarks on the need to offset pernicious practices of abstraction in the context of a renewed concern with the link between conceptuality and materiality in social theory. Whitehead's inquiry into the problematic legacy of Galileo and scientific materialism is then contrasted with a different diagnosis of the abstractive maladies of modern society, the one put forward under the Marxist rubric of `real abstraction'. While both stances allow us to explore the social repercussions of abstractive practices, it is argued that an understanding of the practically abstract character of capitalism permits us to identify the limits of Whitehead's pedagogical wish to reform our culture of abstraction.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toscano, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408091983</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Culture of Abstraction]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>75</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/77?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Need for Metaphysics: On the Categories of Explanation in Process and Reality]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/77?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article explains the importance of the categories of explanation in <I>Process                     and Reality</I> and sets it in context, in particular in relation to                 Whitehead's account of misplaced concreteness and his description of the role of                 metaphysics in terms of common sense. The article then responds to a series of broad                 criticisms of Whitehead's position, notably in the claim that it is                 self-contradictory, inconsistent about common sense and mistaken about the nature of                 explanation in contemporary science. This response comes from a close interpretation                 of the categories as described in <I>Process and Reality</I>. The article                 concludes with a critical discussion of an application of the categories of                 explanation, taken from <I>Process and Reality</I>.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408091984</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Need for Metaphysics: On the Categories of Explanation in Process and Reality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>90</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>77</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/91?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Constructivist Reading of Process and Reality]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/91?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Throughout much of his writing, Whitehead outlines a critique of what he termed the                 `bifurcation of nature'. This position divides the world into objective causal                 nature, on the one hand, with the perceptions of subjects on the other. On such a                 view, truth lies in a reality external to such subjects and it is the task of                 science to deliver clear and immediate access to this realm. Further, judgments                 about this external reality are the province of human subjects and it is the task of                 philosophy to ascertain the validity or otherwise of these. This article outlines                 Whitehead's attempts to develop a conception of nature (and the social) which avoids                 this premise; it also explains how he offers a way for contemporary theories to                 construct or engineer abstractions which go beyond notions of social construction or                 deconstruction. This article argues that not only does Whitehead offer a coherent                 alternative to such approaches but that the manner in which his major text                     (<I>Process and Reality</I> ) is written reflects his commitment to the                 inherently constructed and constructing character of all existence.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stengers, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408091985</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Constructivist Reading of Process and Reality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>110</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Constructivist Flight from `A Constructivist Reading of Process and         Reality']]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Isabelle Stengers anchors the major stake in Whiteheadian philosophy in the notion of                 constructivism. In doing so, the relation of this philosophy of becoming                 &mdash; the first anti-substantialist principle of which is stated as                 `principle of process' &mdash; to the ideas of vitalist intuition as the                 self-expression of the world is announced as eminently problematic. This                 problematizing opening to Whitehead obliges us to think about the constructivist                 nature of his concepts because of their irreducibility to the expression of facts of                 experience since they must necessarily function as a machinic articulation of how                 things become implied in the `ontological principle' of reason; by the same token,                 it poses at the heart of the analysis the question of the pragmatic-speculative                 alterity in Whiteheadian constructivism.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alliez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408091986</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Constructivist Flight from `A Constructivist Reading of Process and         Reality']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>117</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/119?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seeing Animals, Speaking of Nature: Visual Culture and the Question of the Animal]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/119?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article analyses the use of images in the discourse of animal ethics in an attempt to see how visual cultural studies can contribute to the debate in environmental philosophy. Drawing on Derrida's critique of the utilitarian theory of animal liberation and Mitchell's analysis of iconoclasm in visual culture theories, the article argues that an iconoclastic strategy of visual representation in the discourse of animal ethics undermines the very objective of such an ethical theory. Two case studies &mdash; Peter Singer's animal liberation and J.B. Callicott's land ethic &mdash; illustrate an implacable tendency to essentialize the visual and animal identity.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ito, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408091987</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seeing Animals, Speaking of Nature: Visual Culture and the Question of the Animal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>137</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/139?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Destroying Duration: The Critical Situation of Bergsonism in Benjamin's Analysis of Modern Experience]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/139?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The extent to which Walter Benjamin's thought is bound up with the conceptual framework and debates of Bergsonism is overlooked to the detriment of our understanding of both. Benjamin's conception of <I>Erfahrung</I>/ experience is defined in relation to Bergson's conception of experience in the <I>dur&eacute;e</I>/duration. Benjamin implicitly evokes and extends a Bergsonian conception of creativity. This is central to Benjamin's understanding of the political implications of the decay of aura. The enhanced potentiality for creativity constitutes the possibility of new forms of genuine <I>Erfahrung</I> in the scattered debris of the old. This would be based upon an affirmative nihilism, the mobilization of the creative second technology, the loosening of the masses, and the `politicization of art'. Crucially, however, Benjamin rejects Bergson's ahistorical approach to creativity within human experience. Virtual difference, the <I>dur&eacute;e</I>, is not external to human history. Creativity does not `flow into' actual human life but is the actualization of virtual difference that is generated and delimited by given socio-technological conditions. Modern creativity is not the gift of` God but of the capitalist mode of production. Benjamin provides a materialist explanation for the utility of Bergson's conception of creativity in the political critique of the present and a materialist justification for the normative prioritization of openness and qualitative segmentarity. He treats the <I>dur&eacute;e</I> as fully immanent to human experience and affirms a politics that is both more realistic and more committed to the value of difference in itself than is articulated in Bergson's own sociobiology. Benjamin does, as such, make a direct and critical contribution to the contemporary attempt to deploy Bergsonism in political critique and to render vitalism sociological.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blencowe, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408091988</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Destroying Duration: The Critical Situation of Bergsonism in Benjamin's Analysis of Modern Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>158</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Redeeming Indigo]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taussig, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408090655</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Redeeming Indigo]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>15</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/17?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sociology of the Heart: Max Scheler's Epistemology of Love]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/17?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vandenberghe, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408090656</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sociology of the Heart: Max Scheler's Epistemology of Love]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>51</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/53?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Politics of the Walter Benjamin Industry]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/53?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenberg, U. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408090657</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Politics of the Walter Benjamin Industry]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>70</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>53</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/71?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Future Memories: The Construction of Cinematic Hindsight]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/71?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Dijck, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408090658</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Future Memories: The Construction of Cinematic Hindsight]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>87</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/89?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Burden of Sensation and the Ethics of Form: Watching Capturing the Friedmans]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/89?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bell, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408090659</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Burden of Sensation and the Ethics of Form: Watching Capturing the Friedmans]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>101</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/103?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Body Worth Having?: Or, A System of Natural Governance]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/103?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cohen, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408090660</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Body Worth Having?: Or, A System of Natural Governance]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>129</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Narcissism or Informalization?: Christopher Lasch, Norbert Elias and Social Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kilminster, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408090661</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Narcissism or Informalization?: Christopher Lasch, Norbert Elias and Social Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>151</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstracts and Keywords]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276408093907</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstracts and Keywords]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>155</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Debate over Cognitivism]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watson, R., Coulter, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276407086788</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Debate over Cognitivism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>17</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Twenty-five Theses against Cognitivism]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coulter, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276407086789</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Twenty-five Theses against Cognitivism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>32</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[That We Obey Rules Blindly Does Not Mean that We Are Blindly Subservient to Rules]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharrock, W., Dennis, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276407086790</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[That We Obey Rules Blindly Does Not Mean that We Are Blindly Subservient to Rules]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>50</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/51?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The `Hard' Problem of Consciousness Is Continually Reproduced and Made Harder by All Attempts to Solve It]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/51?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Read, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276407086791</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The `Hard' Problem of Consciousness Is Continually Reproduced and Made Harder by All Attempts to Solve It]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/87?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Against `Distributed Cognition']]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/87?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Button, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276407086792</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Against `Distributed Cognition']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Darwinian Cage: Evolutionary Psychology as Moral Science]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276407086793</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Darwinian Cage: Evolutionary Psychology as Moral Science]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>125</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/127?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Language and the Cybernetic Mind]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/127?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armand, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276407086794</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Language and the Cybernetic Mind]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: The New Sociological Imagination by Steve Fuller London: Sage, 2006]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gane, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276407086795</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: The New Sociological Imagination by Steve Fuller London: Sage, 2006]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>156</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/157?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Genetic Governance: Health, Risk and Ethics in the Biotech Era edited by Robin Bunton and Alan Petersen London: Routledge, 2005]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/157?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marks, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/02632764080250020802</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Genetic Governance: Health, Risk and Ethics in the Biotech Era edited by Robin Bunton and Alan Petersen London: Routledge, 2005]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>160</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/161?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstracts and Keywords]]></title>
<link>http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/2/161?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0263276407090853</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstracts and Keywords]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>163</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>161</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>