Theory, Culture & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 19, No. 4, 211-231 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0263276402019004015
© 2002 Theory, Culture & Society Ltd.

Defending Ways of Life

The (Anti-)Terrorist Rhetorics of Bush and Blair

Richard Johnson

Nottingham Trent University

This article explores the rhetorics of President Bush and Prime Minister Blair in the aftermath of 11th September. It takes their differing versions of masculinity as a starting-point. The speeches refer extensively to `ways of life', a concept also worth recovering theoretically. Anti-terrorism is a defence of ways of living which are without moral ambiguity and are in absolute opposition to terrorist `evil'. Bush constructs a hegemony at home as a basis for unilateral global interventions. His Americanism draws on familiar themes (`freedom', patriotism, religion), but also invokes compassion, pugnacity and sporting masculinities, drawn especially from the game of baseball. Blair's more `intellectual' version aims at the construction of an international `community' or coalition with Britain in a pivotal role. The contexts, strengths, vulnerabilities, and political and ethical limits of anti-terrorism are explored in detail, including some correspondence with Al-Qa'ida's fundamentalism.

Key Words: baseball • fundamentalism • hegemony - national/international • masculinities • nationalism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
M. De Goede
Beyond Risk: Premediation and the Post-9/11 Security Imagination
Security Dialogue, April 1, 2008; 39(2-3): 155 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory Culture SocietyHome page
R. Johnson
Post-hegemony?: I Don't Think So
Theory Culture Society, May 1, 2007; 24(3): 95 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
K. Franko Aas
Analysing a world in motion: Global flows meet `criminology of the other'
Theoretical Criminology, May 1, 2007; 11(2): 283 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
K. Erjavec and Z. Volcic
'War on terrorism' as a discursive battleground: Serbian recontextualization of G.W. Bush's discourse
Discourse Society, March 1, 2007; 18(2): 123 - 137.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Review for the Sociology of SportHome page
M. Falcous and M. Silk
Global Regimes, Local Agendas: Sport, Resistance and the Mediation of Dissent
International Review for the Sociology of Sport, December 1, 2006; 41(3-4): 317 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]