This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Neilson, B. Articles by Rossiter, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Precarity as a Political Concept, or, Fordism as Exception

University of Western Sydney

Ned Rossiter

University of Nottingham Ningbo

In 2003, the concept of precarity emerged as the central organizing platform for a series of social struggles that would spread across the space of Europe. Four years later, almost as suddenly as the precarity movement appeared, so it would enter into crisis. To understand precarity as a political concept it is necessary to go beyond economistic approaches that see social conditions as determined by the mode of production. Such a move requires us to see Fordism as exception and precarity as the norm. The political concept and practice of translation enables us to frame the precarity of creative labour in a broader historical and geographical perspective, shedding light on its contestation and relation to the concept of the common. Our interest is in the potential for novel forms of connection, subjectivization and political organization. Such processes of translation are themselves inherently precarious, transborder undertakings.

Key Words: borders • the common • creative labour • Fordism • networks • new institutions • political organization • precarity • regulation school of economics • translation

Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 25, No. 7-8, 51-72 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0263276408097796


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. McDowell and S. Christopherson Transforming work: new forms of employment and their regulation Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, November 1, 2009; 2(3): 335 - 342. [Full Text] [PDF]