This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gill, R. Articles by Pratt, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

In the Social Factory?

Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work

Goldsmiths College and the London School of Economics

Andy Pratt

Urban Cultural Economy at the London School of Economics

This article introduces a special section concerned with precariousness and cultural work. Its aim is to bring into dialogue three bodies of ideas — the work of the autonomous Marxist `Italian laboratory'; activist writings about precariousness and precarity; and the emerging empirical scholarship concerned with the distinctive features of cultural work, at a moment when artists, designers and (new) media workers have taken centre stage as a supposed `creative class' of model entrepreneurs. The article is divided into three sections. It starts by introducing the ideas of the autonomous Marxist tradition, highlighting arguments about the autonomy of labour, informational capitalism and the `factory without walls', as well as key concepts such as multitude and immaterial labour. The impact of these ideas and of Operaismo politics more generally on the precarity movement is then considered in the second section, discussing some of the issues that have animated debate both within and outside this movement, which has often treated cultural workers as exemplifying the experiences of a new `precariat'. In the third and final section we turn to the empirical literature about cultural work, pointing to its main features before bringing it into debate with the ideas already discussed. Several points of overlap and critique are elaborated — focusing in particular on issues of affect, temporality, subjectivity and solidarity.

Key Words: affect • autonomous Marxism • creative industries • cultural work • immaterial labour • precariousness

Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 25, No. 7-8, 1-30 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0263276408097794


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. McDowell and S. Christopherson Transforming work: new forms of employment and their regulation Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, November 1, 2009; 2(3): 335 - 342. [Full Text] [PDF]