| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0263276406065112 Comte and the EncyclopediaTrent University in Canada Against the current background of renewed publisher interests in encyclopedias, the article examines the modern genealogy of the Encyclopedia project. The article focuses particularly on three moments: Bacons Great Instauration and attempted fashioning of a New Organon (as against the old one of Aristotle), the Encylopedia of 1751 and its revolutionary-era successors, and Comtes system of positive philosophy. DAlembert and Diderots classificatory tree, with its secularized capture of moral and political philosophy, was an attempt to improve on Bacon. Comtes grand systematizing was an attempt to cap their efforts by being entirely positive. For this, a science of society and a social standpoint were essential. His effort to fulfill Bacons totalizing dream of fully scientific (re-)systematization of knowledge, was a heroic and perhaps absurd failure. But, the article argues, Comtes critique of Diderot and dAlembert, with respect to what he took to be the radical incoherence of their classificatory tree of knowledge, and his more general critique of both Bacon and 18th-century encyclopedism for holding out the possibility of an objective (as opposed to subjective, and human-centered) synthesis of knowledge, touch on metaphysical features of the epistemic landscape that, in new forms, are still with us. Comtes forthright (and sociologically reflexive) articulation of the technocratic and religious dimensions of the Baconian project also illuminates elements of the (French) Enlightenment and derivatives from it that have not received sufficient attention, particularly in relation to one another.
Key Words: classification Enlightenment positivism social theory
|