This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wynne, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Reflexing Complexity

Post-genomic Knowledge and Reductionist Returns in Public Science

UK ESRC Research Center for the Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics, CESAGen, Lancaster University, UK

Dominant social sciences approaches to complexity suggest that awareness of complexity in late-modern society comes from various recent scientific insights. By examining today’s plant and human genomics sciences, I question this from both ends: first suggesting that typical public culture was already aware of particular salient forms of complexity, such as limits to predictive knowledge (which are often denied by scientific cultures themselves); second, showing how up-to-date genomics science expresses both complexity and its opposites, predictive determinism and reductionism, as coexistent representations of nature and scientific knowledge. I suggest we can understand this self-authored epistemic confusion in modern science by avoiding ‘the usual suspects’ – fading simpler discourses left over from previous scientific times; media oversimplifications; or the need to ‘simplify’ to essentials, for ignorant publics – and looking instead at the silent imaginations of extra-scientific reference groups reflected and projectively performed in scientific discourses-practices themselves. Thus contradictions of complex scientific understandings are systematically created by science’s own embodiment of epistemic commitments influenced by commercial cultures, and by imagined publics who are important new constructed objects of institutional scientific concerns – over authority and trust. New dimensions of complexity thus come alive through paying attention to neglected tacit dimensions of science–society interrelations.

Key Words: complexity • epistemic culture • genomics • imagined publics • prediction-control • reduction • reflexivity • systems biology

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Gross Communicating Ignorance and the Development of Post-Mining Landscapes Science Communication, December 1, 2007; 29(2): 264 - 270. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Glasner and P. Atkinson Book Review: The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics and Culture Body Society, September 1, 2006; 12(3): 123 - 127. [PDF]