Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory, Culture & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cilliers, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Complexity, Deconstruction and Relativism

Paul Cilliers

University of Stellenbosch, South Africa

The acknowledgement that something is complex, it is argued, implies that our knowledge of it will always be limited. We cannot make complete, absolute or final claims about complex systems. Post-structuralism, and specifically deconstruction, make similar claims about knowledge in general. Arguments against deconstruction can, therefore, also be held against a critical form of complexity thinking and a defence of the view from complexity (as presented here) should take account of them. Three of these arguments are investigated: that deconstruction and complexity-thinking lead to relativism, that they are subject to the performative contradiction and that their claims are vague. It is shown that these critiques are not really effective and it is suggested that a responsible approach to complexity has to be provisional, i.e. modest, without being vague or relativistic.

Key Words: complexity • deconstruction • Derrida • limits of knowledge • performative contradiction • relativism

Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 22, No. 5, 255-267 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0263276405058052
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
I. Stevens and P. Cox
Complexity Theory: Developing New Understandings of Child Protection in Field Settings and in Residential Child Care
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2008; 38(7): 1320 - 1336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ECON GEOGRHome page
R. Martin and P. Sunley
Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography
J. Econ. Geogr., September 1, 2007; 7(5): 573 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
H. Wagenaar
Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation: How Citizens and Public Officials Harness the Complexities of Neighborhood Decline
The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2007; 37(1): 17 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]