| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0263276405053721 Foucault on Freedom and CapabilitiesInstitute of Liberal Arts at Emory University Within recent scholarship, a long-standing tendency to view Foucault as pessimistic about the possibilities of activism is now being reversed. For many contemporary commentators who emphasize the themes of personal agency, transgression and radical freedom in their assessment of his thought, Foucault offers new possibilities for political practice and for the pursuit of self-determination. However, an examination of Foucaults work, particularly in the transitional period preceding his so-called ethical writings, indicates his appreciation of basic human needs and functions that complicates the current understanding of Foucault as a philosopher of freedom. Particularly in his discussions of the ideas of desubjectivation and limit-experience, Foucaults work recognizes that prior conditions of psychological, economic and social well-being are prerequisites for any subsequent performance of freedom. Examining this dimension of Foucaults work reveals interesting points of convergence between his thought and the capabilities approach advocated by philosophers such as Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Like them, Foucaults work recognizes that there are some minimal levels of human functioning below which talk of self-determination is misplaced. As such, political philosophy needs to be concerned with the grounds of personal and political obligation, no less than the limits and possibilities of freedom.
Key Words: capabilities approach freedom Michel Foucault limit-experience Martha Nussbaum Amartya Sen
|