Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory, Culture & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crossley, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

From Reproduction to Transformation

Social Movement Fields and the Radical Habitus

Nick Crossley

Department of Sociology and the University of Manchester

The point of departure for this article is the observation that, despite his own personal involvement as an engaged intellectual, Pierre Bourdieu offers a very thin account of social movement activism, and one pre-empted by the rather limited concept of ‘crisis’. The aim of the article, however, is to argue that the central concepts of Bourdieu’s theory of practice can be used to provide an effective and interesting basis for the analysis of social movements, protest and contention. To this end the article demonstrates how the concepts of habitus, capital and field, in particular, resonate with important findings from the social movement literature. The focus of the article is limited to an engagement with Bourdieu. It connects with other work by the author, however, in which he has argued that Bourdieu’s framework can be used to address very serious problems in social movement theory.

Key Words: Bourdieu • contention • contestation • practice • protest

Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 20, No. 6, 43-68 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0263276403206003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
S. Linstead and A. Pullen
Gender as multiplicity: Desire, displacement, difference and dispersion
Human Relations, September 1, 2006; 59(9): 1287 - 1310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Body SocietyHome page
S. Fraser and K. Valentine
'Making Blood Flow': Materializing Blood in Body Modification and Blood-borne Virus Prevention
Body Society, March 1, 2006; 12(1): 97 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminist TheoryHome page
M. Mookherjee
Equality in multiplicity: Reassessing Irigaray's multicultural feminism
Feminist Theory, December 1, 2005; 6(3): 297 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Body SocietyHome page
N. Crossley
Mapping Reflexive Body Techniques: On Body Modification and Maintenance
Body Society, March 1, 2005; 11(1): 1 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]