This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Adkins, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reflexivity

Freedom or Habit of Gender?

University of Manchester

In this article the increasing significance of Bourdieu’s social theory is mapped in recent sociological accounts of gender in late-modern societies. What is highlighted in particular is the influence of Bourdieu’s social theory, and especially his arguments regarding critical reflexivity and social transformation, on a specific thesis which is common to a number of contemporary feminist accounts of gender transformations in late modernity. Here it is suggested that in late modernity there is a lack of fit between habitus and field in certain public spheres of action via an increasing transposition or movement of the feminine habitus from private to public spheres, which is linked to a heightened critical reflexivity vis-à-vis gender and to detraditionalization. In this article, however, a number of limits regarding this line of argument are highlighted, especially those flowing from the unproblematic coupling of reflexivity with detraditionalization. This exploration in turn leads to a critical discussion of Bourdieu’s ideas regarding social transformation. In particular it is asked why, when thinking about social transformation, does Bourdieu abandon his own principles regarding practice?

Key Words: Bourdieu • gender • mimesis • practice • social transformation

Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 20, No. 6, 21-42 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0263276403206002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Gray Putting Emotion and Reflexivity to Work in Researching Migration Sociology, October 1, 2008; 42(5): 935 - 952. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Bowman Men's business: Negotiating entrepreneurial business and family life Journal of Sociology, December 1, 2007; 43(4): 385 - 400. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Westhaver Flaunting and Empowerment: Thinking about Circuit Parties, the Body, and Power Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, December 1, 2006; 35(6): 611 - 644. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Adams Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity:: Towards an Understanding of Contemporary Identity? Sociology, June 1, 2006; 40(3): 511 - 528. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Chambers Masculine domination, radical feminism and change Feminist Theory, December 1, 2005; 6(3): 325 - 346. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Thomson and R. Taylor Between cosmopolitanism and the locals: Mobility as a resource in the transition to adulthood Young, November 1, 2005; 13(4): 327 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. MacKinnon and E. Bullen 'Out on the borderlands': Time, generation and personal agency in women's lives Theory and Research in Education, March 1, 2005; 3(1): 31 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Adkins Passing on Feminism: From Consciousness to Reflexivity? European Journal of Women's Studies, November 1, 2004; 11(4): 427 - 444. [Abstract] [PDF]