This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lovell, T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Resisting with Authority: Historical Specificity, Agency and the Performative Self

Centre for the Study of Women and Gender, and the Department of Sociology, at the University of Warwick

How is it possible for human subjects who are socially constructed to engage in effective and authoritative acts of resistance to the social norms and institutions within which they were formed? Judith Butler, in her engagement with the work of Pierre Bourdieu, locates this possibility in the nature of `speech acts', and in resistance to social norms emanating from the abjected margins of social life. She criticizes Bourdieu for undermining the promise of agency contained in habitus by reducing it to the social field in which it was constituted, thus re-closing `the iron cage' of structural/institutional determination. For Butler, social norms and institutions, dependent as they are on reiterative performance, are intrinsically open to disruption. It is possible, she claims, using as her example Rosa Parks's historical act of resistance in Montgomery, Alabama in 1955, to resist with authority, yet without prior institutional authorization. This article argues that Butler's theory of iterability works to endow the capacity to authorize against the grain of institutional authority with individuals and their acts and hence neglects the social contexts that inform and de-limit this capacity. `Resisting with authority' is possible precisely because it is not endowed by individuals or their acts, but is collective and interactional.

Key Words: agency • authority • habitus • institutions • performance • practice • resistance

Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1-17 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0263276403020001918


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Moshe Temporary versus Permanent: Time framing in the Israeli political arena Time Society, March 1, 2009; 18(1): 154 - 171. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. McLeod and K. Wright The Talking Cure in Everyday Life: Gender, Generations and Friendship Sociology, February 1, 2009; 43(1): 122 - 139. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Scheibelhofer Understanding European Emigration in the Context of Modernization Processes: Contemporary Migration Biographies and Reflexive Modernity Current Sociology, January 1, 2009; 57(1): 5 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Wall and A. Olofsson Young people making sense of risk: How meanings of risk are materialized within the social context of everyday life Young, November 1, 2008; 16(4): 431 - 448. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Jensen and A. Blok Pesticides in the Risk Society: The View from Everyday Life Current Sociology, September 1, 2008; 56(5): 757 - 778. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. P. Hier Transformative democracy in the age of second modernity: cosmopolitanization, communicative agency and the reflexive subject New Media Society, February 1, 2008; 10(1): 27 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Hodgson 'Putting on a Professional Performance': Performativity, Subversion and Project Management Organization, January 1, 2005; 12(1): 51 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF]