This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Pritchard, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Essential Marking

Maori Tattooing and the Properties of Identity

This article examines a range of problems centring on the theorization of cultural identity and cultural property by reference to debates about the appropriation of the Maori `tattoo' or ta moko and the authenticity of contemporary Maori tattooing practices. Through a consideration of the relationship between cultural identity and tattooing, it addresses a problematic concerning the articulation of indigenous `property', `ownership' or `authority' in legal, anthropological and philosophical discourses. Theorizations of `tattoo' as `cultural property', for example, generally assume a certain `proper' relationship between subject and object, precomprehended in terms of Western legal-philosophical concepts. Against the background of these issues, the use of ta moko as a form of signature or authorizing mark of identification is taken to highlight issues concerning the complex relationship between the attribution of certain cultural practices, characteristics or `properties' to a certain group and the notions of authorship and authority that underwrite such designations.

Key Words: cultural identity • cultural property • Maori `tattoo' • ta moko

Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 18, No. 4, 27-45 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/02632760122051869


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?