This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lynch, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge

Reflexivity is a well-established theoretical and methodological concept in the human sciences, and yet it is used in a confusing variety of ways. The meaning of `reflexivity' and the virtues ascribed to the concept are relative to particular theoretical and methodological commitments. This article examines several versions of the concept, and critically focuses on treatments of reflexivity as a mark of distinction or source of methodological advantage. Although reflexivity often is associated with radical epistemologies, social scientists with more conventional leanings often speak of reflexivity as a methodological tool, substantive property of social systems, or source of individual enlightenment. Radical and conventional social scientists alike tend to stress the importance of being reflexive, as opposed to being unreflexive, but they do not share a coherent conception of what `being reflexive' means or entails. As an alternative to reflexive self-privileging, I recommend an ethnomethodological conception of reflexivity as an ordinary, unremarkable and unavoidable feature of action. The ethnomethodological conception does not support a particular theoretical or methodological standpoint by contrasting it to an `unreflexive' counterpart. It has little value as a critical weapon or source of epistemological advantage, which, in the present context, can have advantages of its own for promoting peace and epistemic democracy.

Key Words: ethnomethodology • methodology • objectivity • representation • self-reflection • social theory • sociology of science

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. McLaughlin and K. Turcotte The Trouble with Burawoy: An Analytic, Synthetic Alternative Sociology, October 1, 2007; 41(5): 813 - 828. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Walby On the Social Relations of Research: A Critical Assessment of Institutional Ethnography Qualitative Inquiry, October 1, 2007; 13(7): 1008 - 1030. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Boland Critique as a technique of self: a Butlerian analysis of Judith Butler's prefaces History of the Human Sciences, August 1, 2007; 20(3): 105 - 122. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Wynne Dazzled by the Mirage of Influence?: STS-SSK in Multivalent Registers of Relevance Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 2007; 32(4): 491 - 503. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Neill Grounded theory sampling: The contribution of reflexivity Journal of Research in Nursing, May 1, 2006; 11(3): 253 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. McMylor Reflexive historical sociology: consciousness, experience and the author History of the Human Sciences, November 1, 2005; 18(4): 141 - 160. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. J. Berard Rethinking Practices and Structures Philosophy of the Social Sciences, June 1, 2005; 35(2): 196 - 230. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Jensen and P. Lauritsen Qualitative research as partial connection: bypassing the power-knowledge nexus Qualitative Research, February 1, 2005; 5(1): 59 - 77. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. L. Cunliffe Reflexive Inquiry in Organizational Research: Questions and Possibilities Human Relations, August 1, 2003; 56(8): 983 - 1003. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Dennis Skepticist Philosophy as Ethnomethodology Philosophy of the Social Sciences, June 1, 2003; 33(2): 151 - 173. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Hammersley `Analytics' are No Substitute for Methodology: A Response to Speer and Hutchby Sociology, May 1, 2003; 37(2): 339 - 351. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Speer and I. Hutchby Methodology Needs Analytics: A Rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley Sociology, May 1, 2003; 37(2): 353 - 359. [PDF]

				L. Fendler Teacher Reflection in a Hall of Mirrors: Historical Influences and Political Reverberations Educational Researcher, April 1, 2003; 32(3): 16 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. D. Haggerty Review Essay: Ruminations on Reflexivity Current Sociology, March 1, 2003; 51(2): 153 - 162. [PDF]

				K. Maton Reflexivity, Relationism, & Research: Pierre Bourdieu and the Epistemic Conditions of Social Scientific Knowledge Space and Culture, February 1, 2003; 6(1): 52 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Macbeth Hugh Mehan's Learning Lessons Reconsidered: On the Differences Between the Naturalistic and Critical Analysis of Classroom Discourse American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2003; 40(1): 239 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Webster Innovative Health Technologies and the Social: Redefining Health, Medicine and the Body Current Sociology, May 1, 2002; 50(3): 443 - 457. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lloyd Book Reviews Discourse Society, November 1, 2001; 12(6): 853 - 854. [PDF]