|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge
Michael Lynch
Reflexivity is a well-established theoretical and methodological concept in the human sciences, and yet it is used in a confusing variety of ways. The meaning of `reflexivity' and the virtues ascribed to the concept are relative to particular theoretical and methodological commitments. This article examines several versions of the concept, and critically focuses on treatments of reflexivity as a mark of distinction or source of methodological advantage. Although reflexivity often is associated with radical epistemologies, social scientists with more conventional leanings often speak of reflexivity as a methodological tool, substantive property of social systems, or source of individual enlightenment. Radical and conventional social scientists alike tend to stress the importance of being reflexive, as opposed to being unreflexive, but they do not share a coherent conception of what `being reflexive' means or entails. As an alternative to reflexive self-privileging, I recommend an ethnomethodological conception of reflexivity as an ordinary, unremarkable and unavoidable feature of action. The ethnomethodological conception does not support a particular theoretical or methodological standpoint by contrasting it to an `unreflexive' counterpart. It has little value as a critical weapon or source of epistemological advantage, which, in the present context, can have advantages of its own for promoting peace and epistemic democracy.
Key Words: ethnomethodology • methodology • objectivity • representation • self-reflection • social theory • sociology of science
Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 17, No. 3,
26-54 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/02632760022051202
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
B. Carrington
"What's the Footballer Doing Here?" Racialized Performativity, Reflexivity, and Identity
Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies,
November 1, 2008;
8(4):
423 - 452.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. McLaughlin and K. Turcotte
The Trouble with Burawoy: An Analytic, Synthetic Alternative
Sociology,
October 1, 2007;
41(5):
813 - 828.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Walby
On the Social Relations of Research: A Critical Assessment of Institutional Ethnography
Qualitative Inquiry,
October 1, 2007;
13(7):
1008 - 1030.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Boland
Critique as a technique of self: a Butlerian analysis of Judith Butler's prefaces
History of the Human Sciences,
August 1, 2007;
20(3):
105 - 122.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Wynne
Dazzled by the Mirage of Influence?: STS-SSK in Multivalent Registers of Relevance
Science Technology Human Values,
July 1, 2007;
32(4):
491 - 503.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Neill
Grounded theory sampling: The contribution of reflexivity
Journal of Research in Nursing,
May 1, 2006;
11(3):
253 - 260.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. McMylor
Reflexive historical sociology: consciousness, experience and the author
History of the Human Sciences,
November 1, 2005;
18(4):
141 - 160.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. Berard
Rethinking Practices and Structures
Philosophy of the Social Sciences,
June 1, 2005;
35(2):
196 - 230.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Jensen and P. Lauritsen
Qualitative research as partial connection: bypassing the power-knowledge nexus
Qualitative Research,
February 1, 2005;
5(1):
59 - 77.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. L. Cunliffe
Reflexive Inquiry in Organizational Research: Questions and Possibilities
Human Relations,
August 1, 2003;
56(8):
983 - 1003.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Dennis
Skepticist Philosophy as Ethnomethodology
Philosophy of the Social Sciences,
June 1, 2003;
33(2):
151 - 173.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hammersley
`Analytics' are No Substitute for Methodology: A Response to Speer and Hutchby
Sociology,
May 1, 2003;
37(2):
339 - 351.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Speer and I. Hutchby
Methodology Needs Analytics: A Rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley
Sociology,
May 1, 2003;
37(2):
353 - 359.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Fendler
Teacher Reflection in a Hall of Mirrors: Historical Influences and Political Reverberations
Educational Researcher,
April 1, 2003;
32(3):
16 - 25.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. D. Haggerty
Review Essay: Ruminations on Reflexivity
Current Sociology,
March 1, 2003;
51(2):
153 - 162.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Maton
Reflexivity, Relationism, & Research: Pierre Bourdieu and the Epistemic Conditions of Social Scientific Knowledge
Space and Culture,
February 1, 2003;
6(1):
52 - 65.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Macbeth
Hugh Mehan's Learning Lessons Reconsidered: On the Differences Between the Naturalistic and Critical Analysis of Classroom Discourse
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 2003;
40(1):
239 - 280.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Webster
Innovative Health Technologies and the Social: Redefining Health, Medicine and the Body
Current Sociology,
May 1, 2002;
50(3):
443 - 457.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lloyd
Book Reviews
Discourse Society,
November 1, 2001;
12(6):
853 - 854.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
