Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory, Culture & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lemert, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Clothes Have No Emperor

Bourdieu on American Imperialism

Charles Lemert

`The Clothes Have No Emperor' (a title borrowed from Paul Slansky's hilarious critique of the Reagan years in the USA) means to say that Bourdieu's criticism of American imperialism is an understandable slip of his brilliant visual sociology. He writes to those of a disposition to agree completely because they know the facts all the better. Bourdieu may well be the only person alive today who has so perfectly combined theoretical, empirical and political work. Why then has he allowed this critique to be published for all the world to see? Not, I think, because he is wrong, but because the entailments of his own visual sociology do not translate well from place to place. Bourdieu has taught us that the sociology of social space is the next necessary step for those who would become public intellectuals. The question is how to think and speak of the world as such. Bourdieu has given us the outlines of a beginning, but this little essay in question shows that there is more work yet to be done.

Key Words: global space • imperialism • intellectuals • race • sociology

Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 17, No. 1, 97-106 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/02632760022051031


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social WorkHome page
P. M. Garrett
The Relevance of Bourdieu for Social Work: A Reflection on Obstacles and Omissions
Journal of Social Work, December 1, 2007; 7(3): 355 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
W. Schinkel and J. Tacq
The Saussurean Influence in Pierre Bourdieu's Relational Sociology
International Sociology, March 1, 2004; 19(1): 51 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
YoungHome page
M. Keller and T. Vihalemm
Return to the `Consuming West': Young People's Perceptions about the Consumerization of Estonia
Young, August 1, 2003; 11(3): 195 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Consumer CultureHome page
O. Shevchenko
'In Case of Fire Emergency': Consumption, security and the meaning of durables in a transforming society
Journal of Consumer Culture, July 1, 2002; 2(2): 147 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]