Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory, Culture & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sassen, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Excavating Power

In Search of Frontier Zones and New Actors

Saskia Sassen

This article examines the questions of Power and Discourse in this particular period and argues that we can go beyond the recognition of multiplicities in all domains and hence that we can work at producing a shared normative ground for at least some of these multiple critical positions. It does so by focusing on one particular issue, the need to produce a new narrative about the relation of the national state and the global economy. A more precise and critical appraisal of this interaction signals the existence of new political openings both in and outside the formal political system, and of a new politics that could allow citizens to demand accountability from the new global actors. These new political openings and new politics entail the development of a normativity that engages the question of whose claims are legitimate in a context where the supposed neutrality of markets and technology are seen as obviating the need for normative approaches; and represent a critique of older political lineages centered exclusively in the national state that easily excluded many groups which never completely identified with the national state and its representation of the nation. One of the key tasks for intellectuals today is to dig out the inner architecture of power from under the new rational-technical discourses within which it is embedded.

Key Words: citizens • globalization • normativity • politics • state

Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 17, No. 1, 163-170 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/02632760022050951


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OrganizationHome page
K. Dale
Building a Social Materiality: Spatial and Embodied Politics in Organizational Control
Organization, September 1, 2005; 12(5): 649 - 678.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
R. G. Smith
World city topologies
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2003; 27(5): 561 - 582.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
N. C. Townsley and C. Stohl
Contracting Corporate Social Responsibility: Swedish Expansions in Global Temporary Agency Work
Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 2003; 16(4): 599 - 605.
[PDF]


Home page
Crit SociolHome page
J. Maclean
Review Essay: Globalization and the Failure of the Sociological Imagination: a Review Essay1
Crit Sociol, May 1, 2000; 26(3): 329 - 349.
[PDF]