Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory, Culture & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Americans Again, or the New Age of Imperial Reason?

Global Elite Formation, its Identity and Ideological Discourses

Jonathan Friedman

This commentary argues that while Bourdieu and Wacquant make an important statement on the necessity of coming to grips with a discourse that has become increasingly popular in academic and less than academic circles, this is not a mere downward diffusion from the central halls of US imperialism. It is part and parcel of a massive transformation of the global system, one which has combined a shift in capital accumulation to East and Southeast Asia with a rapid increase of disorder and cultural fragmentation in large parts of the world and with a significant increase in class polarization in economic terms. The reason described as `imperialist reason' is not an American import, but signifies the emergence of a globalized elite identity, one that celebrates movement, the transnational, hybrid and multicultural, and distances itself, in representation as well as reality, from the downwardly mobile and immobile majorities who are themselves becoming increasingly alienated from their own state elites and increasingly xenophobic since they experience variations on `loss of control' over their conditions of existence.

Key Words: globalization • hybrid • intellectual elites • multiculturalism • new classes • world system

Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 17, No. 1, 139-146 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/02632760022051068


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
R. Davidson, N. Poor, and A. Williams
Stratification and Global Elite Theory: A Cross-Cultural and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Opinion
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2009; 21(2): 165 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
D. Weenink
Cosmopolitanism as a Form of Capital: Parents Preparing their Children for a Globalizing World
Sociology, December 1, 2008; 42(6): 1089 - 1106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
D. Weenink
Cosmopolitan and Established Resources of Power in the Education Arena
International Sociology, July 1, 2007; 22(4): 492 - 516.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social ArchaeologyHome page
M. Lazzari
Archaeological Visions: Gender, Landscape and Optic Knowledge
Journal of Social Archaeology, June 1, 2003; 3(2): 194 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]